His reasoning seems to be that most were convicted for other crimes that should be punished severely therefore it’s OK that they received a severe punishment for an act that doesn’t merit a severe punishment.
His explanation doesn’t make the situation seem any better to me.
His reasoning seems to be that most were convicted for other crimes that should be punished severely therefore it’s OK that they received a severe punishment for an act that doesn’t merit a severe punishment.
His explanation doesn’t make the situation seem any better to me.