“Legal highs” ban a government 360°


Peter Dunne: U-turn on legal highs


Legal high u-turn: better late than never

read the headlines.

But there is no U-turn. It’s a full 360°. Here‘s what Peter Dunne’s now saying.

Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne has announced today that when parliament resumes the government will introduce and pass under urgency legislation removing from sale all remaining so called ‘legal highs’.

But here‘s what the Associate Minister of Health, Peter Dunne, said in March last year.

Last month, the New Zealand Government introduced new legislation into our Parliament …

We are going to reverse the onus of proof so the manufacturers of these products have to prove they are safe before they can bring them on to the market.

Currently, the onus is on the Government to identify the substances that are being sold, test them and prove that they warrant sufficient harm to be prohibited.

That approach has undermined our best efforts to keep our young people safe, and left the rather tawdry legal highs industry constantly one step ahead, despite our best efforts.

Instead of reversing the onus of proof like Peter Dunne said the government would, Peter Dunne allowed the sale of 15 novel, untested research chemicals to the general public. The safety profiles of these 15 chemicals was, and still is, unknown.

This approach, asking the industry to identify the substances that are being sold, but then not testing them and not proving that they warrant sufficient harm to be prohibited, for the entirety of a nine month “interim” period, undermined the government’s best efforts to keep our young people safe, and left the rather tawdry legal highs industry constantly one step ahead, despite their best efforts.

But now Peter Dunne’s reversed his U-turn and followed through on his original promise.

So, why are my fellow drug law reformers now complaining?

This Government is trying to hold back the rising tide of global drug law reform by any means necessary.
Once this massive wave of change has crashed down on their heads, they’ll all emerge from the backwash claiming that ending drug prohibition was their plan all along.

Holding back the rising tide of global drug law reform? I thought the Pychoactive Substances Act, now to be implemented as originally intended, was supposed to be world leading legislation? The government has made good on its promise, albeit nine months late, and is now making its best efforts to keep our young people safe. Isn’t reversing the onus of proof so the manufacturers of designer drugs have to prove they are safe before they can bring them on to the market exactly what you wanted? If not, why on earth are you supporting the Psychoactive Substances Act?

This subject is a political Hot potato at the moment because of the absolute spineless flip flop of the National party and Peter Dunne in regards to Legal Highs, and the Psychoactive Substances Act in the wake of Labour David Cunliffes desperate and dirty Election year tactics to ride the wave of mindless phobia, media sensationalism, and non-scientific condemnation of synthetic cannabis use.
We have witnessed a full revival of the Witch Craze… “Synthetic Reefer Madness” .

No. What we’re witnessing is the National government deciding not to be criminally insane and instead making good on Peter Dunne’s original prohibitionist promise. Again, I ask, why on earth are you supporting the Psychoactive Substances Act? In a couple of weeks, once the blanket ban on soon-to-be-not “legal highs” comes into force, we’ll back to peak prohibition. Peak prohibition was always the intent of the Psychoactive Substances Act. For heaven’s sake, it was masterminded by Peter Dunne! What else did you expect?! The testing regime, whereby only psychoactive substances proven to be “low-risk” (at the sole expense of the would-be distributor) are allowed to be sold, isn’t even in sight. That light you think you see at the end of the tunnel? It’s a train wreck in slow motion coming for you!

As I’ve always maintained, the Psychoactive Substances Act is pure evil.

What can drug law reformers do now? Two things.

First, join the Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party. This September 20, tick the leaf. Vote for sensible cannabis law reform! 🙂

Second, give credit where credit’s due. Right now credit’s due to the Labour Party and, in particular, to Hutt South MP Trevor Mallard. Sign the petition now!

Are you against animal testing for synthetic drugs? We are.

The government hasn’t ruled out animal testing in the changes to the legal high laws yet. Labour’s suggested a change that’ll protect animals – but it’ll only be successful if enough of us put pressure on the government to do the right thing. So we’ve started a petition to put the pressure on.

Sign the petition now! www.labour.org.nz/AnimalTesting


5 thoughts on ““Legal highs” ban a government 360°”

  1. I never supported the Act Richard, and you know it!
    I condemned *you*for supporting it… esp for demanding the government to ban the products which had a temporary exemption.
    And you are now ‘Happy’ that Dunne and co have flip flopped on election year and closed the back door which at least allowed *some liberty and self responsibility*

    I would not be celebrating if I were you because this travesty has actually set Cannabis Law reform backwards not forwards.
    This ‘Victory’ has emboldened the Prohibitionists who now realise they can kick up a stink on election year… that the media will run with it…. and the Politicians will scramble to save their own Careers …. no matter what the truth or justice of the matter.
    Thus even if Cannabis Laws are reformed one year… they will be re-established the next election year…. This is what this flip flop proves about how our Nanny state operates.
    It also shows it is ten times easier to get things Banned than it is to get things liberated…
    Shame on you for being a part of the Anti-synthetic Lynch mob.

  2. And now you have got your way…. please spare us any of your fake concerns about Animal testing…. You can blame yourself for that…. that’s what you asked for.

  3. I condemned *you*for supporting it…

    Ridiculous, Tim. I have never supported the Psychoactive Substances Act. I have consistently denounced it from its inception as pure evil.

    I’ll respond to the rest of your comment later.

    Happy J Day! 🙂

  4. Bullshit Richard You Castigated Dunne *for not enforcing it rigorously enough*…. calling his *lesser tyranny* *Criminally insane*….etc.
    And Next you will be bleating about the poor animals which will be used in your ‘Safer than Alcohol’ regime.
    *You Richard* are like a chicken with it’s head cut off flapping your wings and running all over the Farmyard without a plan…
    You and all your Mates sold out idealism to what you thought was a pragmatic easier path.
    It turns out to be the Road to hell!
    Freedom is not divisible.
    Your transitional scheme was only moral *as long as you did not stoop to propagating the Idea that it was the State job to *make society safer*.
    And then you jumped on the Luddite phobia that thoughtlessly entails a hatred of all things ‘scientific’ and a delusional worship of all things ‘Natural’…. which translated into a convenient yet bigoted and utterly Un-objective call to Ban synthetics and legalising Pot.
    *Totally Hypocritical*
    *Totally Bigoted*
    And this has worked to prolong and re-vitalise the War on Drugs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *