How to win the argument that Maori ceded sovereignty. NZ Media Watch on X.

Shared with permission from ‘NZ Media Watch’ post on ‘X’ here

NZ Media Watch. on X

How to win the argument that Maori ceded sovereignty

Q1. Was the main purpose of Te Tiriti o Waitangi for Maori to cede sovereignty to Queen Victoria?
A1: Yes. It is clearly stated in the Maori, English and translated versions of the Treaty such as:

Article 1
The chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes and the other chiefs who have not joined the confederation, cede to the Queen of England for ever the entire Sovereignty of their country.

Article 3
In return for the cession of the Sovereignty to the Queen, the people of New Zealand shall be protected by the Queen of England and the rights and privileges of British subjects will be granted to them.

Copies of the Treaty can be viewed here: http://nzmediawatch.com/Treaty_of_Waitangi_side_by_side_-_Maori_English_Translation.html

Q2: Did the Maori chiefs understand the meaning of sovereignty?
A2: Yes. Documented and verified historical evidence shows that Maori understood the meaning of sovereignty in the Treaty. For example, at the signing of the Treaty on February 5th, 1840 missionary William Colenso made detailed notes of the meeting. Endorsement of Colenso’s authenticity is the fact that the Māori Council in 1987 used his record of the speeches to validate their claims. Here’s some quotes affirming that Maori understood the meaning of sovereignty:

Hoani Heke – chief of the Matarahurahu Tribe: “Yes, it is not for us, but for you, our fathers – you missionaries – it is for you to say, to decide, what it shall be.”

Tamati Waka Nene – chief of the Ngatihao Tribe: “I, Tamati Waka say to thee, sit. Do not thou go away from us: remain for us – a father, a judge, a peacemaker”

Later, in 1858, Hōne Heke’s tribe (Ngāpuhi) re-erected the flagpole at Russell, that he was famous for cutting down, and said: “We have a Queen, Queen Victoria. Which is what we agreed to in the Treaty”.

At the 1860 Kohimarama conference in Auckland these Maori validated that they ceded sovereignty by stating:

Wikiriwhi Matehonoa of Ngati Porou: “We are all under the sovereignty of the Queen”

Horomona Toremi of Ngati Raukawa in Otaki: “You over there (the Pakehas) are the only chiefs… Let there be one word for all this land”.

Tamati Waka Nene, one of the leaders who signed at Waitangi, said: “I know no sovereign but the Queen, and I never shall know any other. I am walking by the side of the Pakeha”.

More info here: https://bassettbrashandhide.com/post/dr-lawrie-knight-fact-checking-waitangi-tribunal-finding

Q3: There were over 80,000 Maori and only around 2,000 settlers. Why would Maori cede sovereignty?
A3: There are many reasons such as:

1. Northern Maori were afraid that the Southern tribes would come and slaughter them for Utu – because the Northern tribes had previously slaughtered the Southern tribes.

2. Maori were afraid of the French: “We have heard that the tribe of Marian [the French] is at hand, coming to take away our land”.

3. With the advent of whalers, traders, sailors and settlers disease was decimating Maori at around 4,000 deaths a year. There was a strong possibility that Maori could become extinct if something wasn’t done.

New Zealand had no law and had become very dangerous. Maori wanted the English to bring their technology and governance to fix it.

View our video about it here: https://x.com/nz_media_watch/nz_media_watch/status/1765921884254929198

Finally, though some might say that the 2014 Waitangi Tribunal findings that “in February 1840 the rangatira who signed te Tiriti did not cede their sovereignty”, that is just opinion and not based on verifiable historic evidence. Only the Maori version of the Treaty should be used to determine its meaning because Captain Hobson, as requested by Queen Victoria, stated that the Maori Tiriti o Waitangi was the true agreement and that all other copies “… and all signatures that are subsequently obtained are merely testimonials of adherence to the terms of that original document” which is Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Reference: McQueen, Ewen (2020). One Sun in the Sky: The untold story of sovereignty and the Treaty of Waitangi. First Edition. New Zealand: Benefitz Ltd.

**************************************************
Related posts from Tim…

The New Zealand War of the 1860s was not a ‘Land war’… It was a Sovereignty War.

Murder and Mayhem in Opotiki. Part 1. Weakness enforcing the Law increases Lawlessness and Chaos.

Should New Zealand Remain in the Commonwealth? Yes! (Charles is the Bud-light of Kings. update)

Ardern Government Will Use ‘History Curriculum’ To Indoctrinate Our Children With Racist Falsehoods. Tim Wikiriwhi’s submission for ‘ Aotearoa New Zealand’s Histories in the New Zealand Curriculum

War in the Waikato. Rebuttal of the O’Malley report for Hamilton City Council with regards to the proposal to change the name of our city to Kirikiriroa.

New Zealand High Court quashes ‘Unlawful’ Vaccine mandate…

4:56 pm on 25 February 2022

The High Court has quashed the Covid-19 vaccine mandate for police and Defence Force staff.

The order required Defence Force personnel, and police constables, recruits and authorised officers to have two doses of the vaccine by 1 March, or face termination.

Fewer than 300 of the more than 31,000 staff affected by the mandate across the organisations remain unvaccinated.

On 6 January, three unvaccinated staff sought a judicial review of the mandate.

They were supported by affidavits from 37 of their colleagues in the same situation.

Justice Cooke today released his decision which upheld their claims the vaccination order breached their rights under the Bill of Rights Act.

While the judge did not accept some of the applicants’ arguments, he agreed the mandate infringed on section 11 and section 15 of the Act.

Read more here

Prime Minister Chris Luxon’s AWESOME speech to ‘Local Government New Zealand’ 21-8-24.

Below is a speech recently delivered by NZ PM Chris Luxon at a conference filled with ‘Local/regional/City Mayors and councilors whereby he put them on notice to quit their extravagant spending habits on Socialist ‘White elephants’ and to return to taking care of their core responsibilities.
His speech embodied much of my own 2 decades of activism and engagement in local body politics whereby I have been calling for an end to the largess… an end to all the woke insanity… etc.
Though I am not a Luxon fan… he gets top marks for this excellent speech that hits the nail squarely on the head!

His speech was not well received… no surprises there!

Jordan Williams, Exec Director of the NZ taxpayers Unions reports…. “Immediately following the Prime Minister, the Labour-aligned President of Local Government New Zealand, Sam Broughton, got up and tried to put the boot into Mr Luxon.

Broughton said that criticism of local government “is not productive”. That got a loud cheer from the attendees in the room. He also called on new ways for councils to tax local communities, in addition to rates!

Read the speech for yourselves and you will see why it would have made the average Woke City Mayor and Councilors writhe in their chairs.

Tim Wikiriwhi

Christian Libertarian.

Read on!


Photo credit: Skynews.

Rt Hon Christopher Luxon
Prime Minister

21 August 2024

Speech to LGNZ SuperLocal

conference

Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora and good afternoon, everyone.

Before I begin, I’d like to thank LGNZ for their invitation to speak here today.

I spend a lot of time meeting with many good mayors and councillors across the country, but this is a great opportunity to speak to so many of you here all at once.

So, thank you to LGNZ for that opportunity, and more importantly, thank you to each of you for stepping into the public square and serving your communities in these roles.

I’d also like to acknowledge Minister Simon Watts and, in particular, Minister Simeon Brown, who are here.

As you know, Simeon is responsible for the Local Government portfolio, has an ambitious reform programme, and has accomplished a lot in a very short period of time. So, thank you, Simeon, for all of your hard work and leadership.

New Zealand faces big infrastructure challenges – Water. Transport. Resilience. And each of those will be absolutely critical to get right.

We know your communities need the tools to sustainably finance the necessary investment. So, we’re making changes.

Through changes agreed by the Local Government Funding Authority, we’re alleviating pressure on council debt caps, which will relieve a lot of pressure on fast-growing councils.

We’re presenting a suite of options for achieving local water reform that will satisfy ratings agencies’ concerns while maintaining local control of water.

We’re also taking a hard look at a range of rules and regulations that incur costs that central government directly loads onto councils. Traffic management is a good example of an area we know desperately needs change.

And Simeon Brown will soon present more detail on our framework for Regional Deals – how they will work, what we want to enable for communities, and, most importantly, what we expect in return.

So, we’re doing our part. And I believe it’s time for local government to do theirs.

Ratepayers expect local government to do the basics and to do the basics brilliantly. Pick up the rubbish. Fix the pipes. Fill in potholes. And more generally, maintain local assets quickly, carefully, and cost effectively.

But nothing in life is free, and ratepayers expect to pay for it in exchange. But what they don’t expect to pay for is the laundry-list of distractions and experiments that are plaguing council balance sheets across the country.

The building we’re in today is a classic example. With pipes bursting and other infrastructure under pressure, Wellington City Council decided to spend $180 million of ratepayers’ money on a convention centre, which, according to public reporting, is now losing money.

It looks very nice, and it’s very nice that politicians like us have another expensive room to deliver speeches in, but can anyone seriously say it was the right financial decision or the highest priority for Wellington given all of its challenges?

Ratepayers are sick of the white elephants and non-delivery. So, my challenge to all of you is to rein in the fantasies and to get back to delivering the basics brilliantly.

Councillors often tell me that they agree with all that, but there’s a problem. They just need more help from central government, usually in the form of cold, hard cash.

I have to be honest with you – the previous government might have taken that approach, but the party is over.

There is no magic money tree in Wellington, thanks to the previous government’s economic mismanagement and vandalism.

Shifting your costs onto taxpayers doesn’t save anyone any money. It means ratepayers pay more tax, and are left with less of their own money, to meet the cost of a slightly smaller rates bill.

Or it means we spend less on health and education so that councils can avoid tightening their belts exactly as Kiwi families, businesses and central government have had to do across New Zealand.

Yes, I’m sure that will be very popular among councillors, who want to spend money without raising rates to pay for it. But if any of you think those will be the terms of a regional deal, it’s time to come back to reality.

We do want to work closer together – and there will be new revenue tools for councils, where that makes sense – but the days of handouts are over.

I know some councils already well understand that new operating environment and they are taking their responsibility to ratepayers very seriously.

Thank you for those efforts, because your unrelenting focus on delivering value for money is making a real difference in your communities.

Finally, if there was any doubt about our commitment to getting local government back to basics, I have some announcements to make today on our local government work programme.

First, Cabinet has agreed to streamline the purpose provisions in the Local Government Act to get councils back to basics.

For Councils, that means abolishing the four wellbeing provisions in legislation and restoring focus on local services and infrastructure.

For ratepayers, it’s simple. The central government focuses on must-haves, not nice-to-haves, and we expect local government to do the same.

Second, Cabinet has agreed to investigate performance benchmarks for local councils, similar to the approach some Australian states apply to their local authorities.

In theory, the Local Government Act establishes the accountability of local authorities to the communities they serve. But in reality, it’s difficult to get consistent, easily accessible and comparable information about how councils are actually performing.

The performance measures we’re looking to introduce are in areas councils should already be monitoring closely, such as financial performance and customer service delivery.

But sunlight is the best disinfectant – and ratepayers deserve to know exactly what they’re getting for their rates.

Third, Cabinet has agreed to investigate options to limit council expenditure on ‘nice-to-haves’.

In some Australian states, revenue caps are applied to non-core activities to control rates increases.

We’re interested in how a similar approach could work here in New Zealand, ensuring the right balance between ratepayers’ interests and councils’ financial positions.

Yes, councils need adequate revenue to fund core responsibilities like roads, rubbish and water, but the value-for-money proposition is more questionable in a range of other areas.

Councils need to examine those areas more closely, and I’m up for any tool – like revenue capping – that makes them do so.

Fourth, Cabinet has agreed to review the transparency and accountability rules that apply to councils.

It’s unacceptable that the rules as they stand today allow unelected officials, in many cases, to prevent elected members from accessing the information they need to represent their communities. We will review those settings.

There have been too many absurd scenarios in which ratepayers are effectively shut out of decision-making because elected members’ rights to access information are treated as a secondary consideration.

My expectation is we find a way to end those practices.

In conclusion, we want a productive and constructive relationship with local government – one that enables your growth and development and gives you the tools you need to pay for it.

But we expect you to spend ratepayers’ money responsibly. In short, localism comes with both rights and responsibilities.

In central government, we’re getting on with the job. We’re stopping wasteful spending, shifting money from the back office to the frontline, setting clear delivery targets and expectations, prioritising what to do and what not to do, and letting Kiwis keep more of what they earn.

My parting message: it’s time for you to do the same.

Go line by line, stop the wasteful spending, remove the bureaucracy, focus on better customer service, and end the projects that aren’t delivering value for money.

Ratepayers don’t expect much – they just want the basics done brilliantly.

We’ll play our part – now it’s time for you to play yours.

I’m confident that working together, we can achieve a lot for New Zealanders – better infrastructure and more resilient communities, all at an affordable price for ratepayers.

Thank you.

ENDS

*********************************

More from Tim.

If only Hamiltonians had listened to me. Your 38 million dollar mistake!

How to solve Hamilton’s rates crisis

Wikiriwhi for Hamilton Mayor.

‘Revolution At The Roots’ Making Hamilton’s City Council smaller,better, and more conducive towards Prosperity. Tim Wikiriwhi.

“The Problem with America… Government is trying to become God… Look at how they messed up the Black Community…” Bishop Patrick Wooden

” Welfare messed us up! The problem with Socialist Government is that it’s trying to take Gods place…” (paraphrased)

The Stone Roses…. Satanists… “I wanna be adored…”

Rock/Metal… some are peddling Satan’s foolery…

Lyrics…

I don’t have to sell my soul
He’s already in me
I don’t need to sell my soul
He’s already in me

[Chorus]
I wanna be adored
I wanna be adored

[Refrain]
I don’t have to sell my soul
He’s already in me
I don’t need to sell my soul
He’s already in me

[Chorus]
I wanna be adored
I wanna be adored

[Instrumental Bridge]

[Chorus]
Adored
I wanna be adored

[Bridge]
You adore me
You adore me
You adore me, I wanna, I wanna
I wanna be adored
I wanna
I wanna, I wanna be adored
I wanna, I wanna, I wanna be adored
I wanna, I wanna, I gotta be adored

[Outro]
(I wanna, I wanna, I wanna)
I wanna be adored