Uncategorized

The Platform vs The Broadcasting Standards Authority. Youtube.

Leave a comment

100% Sean. This is a usurpation of greater powers and authority than they were granted by Law.
This is a demonstration of the Nature of tyranny… the tendency and penchant to accrue… to claw.. to itself more and more power, at the expense of the Rights and liberties of the people.
And It hinges upon…. relies upon the acquiescence of the victim. It the expectation that you will voluntarily surrender your rights to their arbitrary self-appointment of authority over you.
The Broadcasting Standard’s Authority has been a menus and bane to Free speech ever since it’s inception. It has zero credibility and ought to be abolished.
That this action was spawned by the malice of Far left Woke activists is yet another demonstration of the importance of Free Speech! You have the right to say that in your opinion Tikanga is Mumbo-jumbo in the very same sense that Atheists may say the Bible is Mumbo-jumo… or I may say that Atheism is a superstition.
Free speech is an essential right for freedom of conscience and freedom of religion. All things The radical Woke Left seek to overthrow.
Thank you for sharing this with us… We have the right to know what devious activities these Public servants are conspiring against us.
They have no right to expect they can operate in the dark.

It’s not for the BSA to re-define the meaning of the word ‘Broadcaster’.
What matter is what that word was understood to mean *back in the 80s when the law was written.*
That is how Law is rightfully applied.
Back then the internet was not even a thing.

In a Public Debate some will claim they can objectively prove that it is Mumbo-jumbo.
Others will equally claim to be able to defend it with Facts and principles.
It’s up to the audience to be persuaded either way… some will agree that Tikanga is mumbo-jumbo… others will remain staunch supporters.
Whether anyone was swayed one way or the other by the debate … who knows… The Import thing is we… the people have the right to discuss such matters and form our own opinions. just because some people get ‘upset’ about what others say and think… does not give them the right to call in the Gov henchmen to punish those with whom they disagree. FUCK EM!

Tim Wikiriwhi
Christian Libertarian.

Alternative Medicines and Treatments, Cancer

Many Cancers are caused by Parasites. De-worm regularly!

3 Comments

From X here
Cleanse Parasites .com 🧹🪱 Herbal Cleanse Co.
@parasitedetox
·
10 Oct
CANCER: A VIRAL disease which is caused by a parasite called “PLASMODIUM” It feeds off Glycoprotein, Glycolipids, and Mucopolysaccharides of the Mucosal membrane invading the blood cells eating the Iron phosphate molecule out of them creating abnormal cell division and uncontrollably destroying body tissue. Cancer ,Herpes, Sickle-cell, Leukemia, Lupus, Chlamydia, Candidiasis, Tumors, Asthma, Arthritis, MS, Malaria, Literally EVERY DISEASE IS (MUTATION and REORGANIZING Of CELLS) Which Is Caused By A COMPROMISED MUCUS MEMBRANE, WITH A GLYCO PROTEIN PARASITIC THAT FOLLOWS! Parasites Groups: .Plasmodium .Microsporidia .Legionella .Chlamydia .Tape Worm .Hook Worm .Fluke Worm .Ring Worm .Toxoplasma gondii .Diphyllobothrium .Dracunculus medinensis .Helminths Parasites are prolific breeders that rob you of nutrients and produce toxic waste. Approximately 50 percent of people carry parasites. Up to 80 percent of people with chemical and metal toxicity and people with IBS and SIFO have parasites. There are over 100 different types of parasites that live in human hosts. Do you have 3 or more of these common signs & symptoms? – Headaches – Brain fog – Grinding teeth – Heart palpitations – Anxiety/depression – Aches/joint pain – Increased hunger – Circles under eyes – Insomnia/poor sleep quality – Iron-deficiency/anemia – GI issues – Acne/other skin issues such as a rash, eczema, dandruff (itchy scalp) or psoriasis If you can say yes to 3 or more above …. Comment DEWORM

*********

* This is not an advertisement to sell products.

I herd about this particular claim over 30 years ago.
The claim was that every Cancer sufferer had 2 things present.
1. Fluke worms.
2. Isopropyl Alcohol.

Back then the recommended treatment (for New Zealanders) was a course of ‘Malcolm Harker’s Formula 825… ‘Verm-ez Tonic’ De-wormer ‘Intestinal cleanse’.
It contained Wormwood, Green walnut husk, Clove oil, Thymol.

It is now marketed as ‘Harker Herbals Intestinal Cleanse’.

X AI Grok says this about Formula 825….

Key Benefits and Uses. Primary Purpose:
Acts as a “spring clean” for the intestinal tract, helping to remove parasites from the intestines, blood, glands, and organs. It discourages microbial imbalances and supports overall detoxification.
Health Support:Improves nutrient absorption and mineral uptake from food.
Boosts energy levels, strength, and feelings of well-being.
Enhances the effectiveness of other herbal tonics in the Harker range.
Supports healthy digestion and microbial balance in the gut.

Recommended Usage: Take 4 times a year for 7–14 days as a cleanse. It’s suitable for all ages (including children, with adjusted doses) and can be used long-term. Not recommended during pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Dosage Example (from product guidelines):Adults: 5–10ml (1–2 tsp) up to 4 times daily, diluted in water.
Children: Reduced doses based on age (e.g., 1–2.5ml for ages 2–12).

Complementary Use: Often paired with Harker Herbals Wormwood Syrup for intensive de-worming or Formula 896 Giardia Guard for specific protozoa issues. For thyroid support (e.g., Formula 782), start with 825 for the first two weeks.

IngredientsFormula 825 is 100% natural, vegan-friendly, and made with a blend of organic and wild-crafted herbs in a glycerine and water base (no alcohol). The core active ingredients focus on anti-parasitic and cleansing properties:Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium): Traditional anti-parasitic herb.
Green Walnut Hull (Juglans nigra): Supports expulsion of intestinal worms.
Clove Oil (Syzygium aromaticum): Antimicrobial and digestive aid.
Thymol (from Thyme, Thymus vulgaris): Natural antiseptic for gut health.
Additional supporting herbs and essential oils (up to 20 in the full blend) for soothing and toning the digestive system.

Full formulations are proprietary but emphasize low bitterness, with a sweet chicory root fiber base for palatability. It’s independently tested for purity and potency.

1984, Death of Britain, Democracy, Digital hell, Digital slavery., Free Speech, Freedom, Sheeple, Slavery, Social Conditioning, Socialism, Tax, Tyranny, UN 666, WEF, What Have You Been Smoking?, WHO, Woke extremism, World Economic Forum, Zombies

We must be ready to count the cost of Rejecting Digital ID.

Leave a comment

1984, Banks are Evil.

Australia’s Banks are Refusing to Give Australians their own money… Banks demanding Private information. Banks say they are keeping their customers ‘safe’.

1 Comment

Apartheid, Equality before the Law, Outstanding Individual Contributions, Racism, Righteous Rants, Te Tiriti o Waitangi, Treaty of Waitangi

Donna Katae, Otago Peninsula Board Candidate: Opposes separate Maori Wards. “Maori don’t need a Treaty, or special treatment”. Reality Check Radio.

Leave a comment

1984, Death of America, Death of Britain, Democracy, Digital hell, Digital slavery., Fascist Regime, Total Control, Totalitarianism, Transhumanism, Tyranny, World Economic Forum

Journalist Whitney Webb outlines the plan to tether your existence to a state-managed digital profile.

Leave a comment

Camas on X

The global pivot to Digital ID is not an isolated upgrade. It is the foundational control grid for the entire new digital financial system, explicitly designed to be inseparable from CBDCs.

As journalist Whitney Webb outlines, the plan is to tether your existence to a state-managed digital profile using your most intimate data: your face, your fingerprints, your iris. This biometric bridge links your physical identity to a digital wallet, creating a unified system of identification and control.

The marketing language is “equity” and “inclusion,” championed by the UN’s Agenda 2030 under the guise of providing “legal identity for all.” But this is a profound misdirection. The reality is inherent exclusion. Without this Digital ID, you will be legally unrecognized—unable to access services, exercise rights, or participate in society. It is inclusion only in their system, on their terms.

We’ve already witnessed the prototype: the vaccine passport. It was a dry run linking identity to permission for movement. Those who opted out were excluded. This is the permanent model.

The stated goal is global sustainable development. The functional outcome is a system of unparalleled surveillance and behavioral control, where every transaction and movement is tied to a state-approved identity. Compliance is granted access; dissent is rendered invisible.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a coordinated policy, documented by the UN and the Bank for International Settlements. The question is no longer if they are building this system, but whether we will accept a future where our very identity is a tool for our own control.

Te Tiriti o Waitangi, Treaty of Waitangi

Britain ‘Fudged’ the Treaty of Waitangi. Ross Baker. One New Zealand Foundation.

Leave a comment

Britain fudged it to get the Treaty across the Line.
On 5 September 2025, Julian Batchelor, Stop Co-Governance, wrote the following email stating, “The reason the British declared NZ to be a sovereign nation was so that they could sign a treaty with Maori. For a treaty to be effectual legally, it has to be between two sovereign nations. i.e. Britain fudged it to get the Treaty across the line”.

But was ‘sovereignty’ fudged to get the Treaty across the line?

Since this time, I have given this a lot of thought and while Britain may have, “Tried to fudge the Treaty to get it across the line”, when the facts are known, those involved in drafting the Treaty of Waitangi knew Maori could not, and did not have sovereignty over New Zealand in 1840.
Lord Normanby’s treaty instructions to Captain William Hobson, dated 14 August 1839, stated, “We acknowledge New Zealand as a sovereign and independent State”, but he then went on to say, “So far at least as it is possible to make such acknowledgment in favour of a people composed of numerous, dispersed, and petty tribes, who possess few political relations to each other, and are incompetent to act, or even to deliberate in concert”.

From this clause, Lord Normanby knew Maori could not, and did not have sovereignty over New Zealand in 1840.Rev Henry Williams and his son Edward would not allow the Treaty, “To be fudged to get it across the line” and changed “sovereignty” to “government/kawanatanga” when they translated Lt. Governor Hobson’s final draft into the Tiriti o Waitangi, on the night of 4 February 1840.“Kawanatanga” was the word Rev Henry Williams had used for “government” in the 1835 Declaration of Independence with “Sovereignty” translated to “Kingitanga”.

Every Tiriti o Waitangi and Maori to English dictionary also has “kawanatanga” translated to “government”. Before the Treaty was read to the gathering at Waitangi on 5 February 1840, Lt. Governor Hobson, British Resident James Busby and Rev. Henry Williams met behind closed doors to check Rev Henry William’s translation of the Treaty of Waitangi into the Maori language; Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Both Hobson and Busby agree with the word “sovereignty” being changed to “kawanatanga/government” as they also knew Maori could not and did not have sovereignty over New Zealand in 1840.British Resident James Busby had tried to get the chiefs to claim sovereignty over New Zealand with his Declaration of Independence in 1835, but as he could only entice 52 chiefs out of about 600 to sign the Declaration due to the tension and fighting between the tribes, the Declaration was abandoned without one meeting ever taking place. Rev Henry Williams had used the word “Kingitanga” for “Sovereignty” and “kawanatanga” for “government” when he translated the Declaration of Independence into Maori. Lord Normanby was correct in his instructions to Hobson, “It was not possible to make such acknowledgment in favour of a people composed of numerous, dispersed, and petty tribes, who possess few political relations to each other, and are incompetent to act, or even to deliberate in concert”. This was confirmed by Chief Justice, Sir James Prendergast in 1877 when he ruled at the trial between Wi Parata v the Bishop of Wellington, stating, “So far indeed as that instrument (The Treaty of Waitangi) purported to cede the sovereignty it must be regarded as a ‘simple nullity’. No political body existed capable of making cession of sovereignty”. While Britain tried to “Fudge Sovereignty to get the Treaty across the line”, those involved in drafting it did not allow this to happen. They knew, Maori did not have sovereignty over New Zealand in 1840, therefore, Lt Governor Hobson had to ask the 540 chiefs to sign the Treaty as individual chiefs as there was, “No political body existed capable of making cession of sovereignty”, which made the Treaty of Waitangi a ‘simple nullity’ as it was not signed between two Sovereign Nations.

Researcher, Ross Baker.
One New Zealand Foundation Inc.

www.onenzfoundation.co.nz 24/9/25

Give me Liberty, or give me Death!