"We are resilient, resourceful people who can represent ourselves. We don't need any special treatment." — Donna Katae, Otago Peninsula Board Candidate
Are Māori Wards strengthening representation — or undermining it?
🎥 Watch here: https://t.co/4GGsY7AMXN
— REALITY CHECK RADIO (@RCR_NZ) October 6, 2025
I have been slow to write on the tragic end of the ‘Rambo-dad saga’… Tom Phillips, The father who took his 3 children into the New Zealand bush and alluded police for 4 years.
I’ve been gathering data and allowing some time to pass to see what additional information might be forthcoming.
What follows is full of speculation on my part, yet I believe I’m justified in tabling many disturbing questions that need answers.
I provide *context* as to why such questions are valid.
There was an eclipse the very hour Tom fell to a Policeman’s bullet.
An evil sign in the heavens.
A dark cold morning. 8 September 2025. Piopoi Waikato.
In the shootout he badly injured and nearly killed a Lawman who had thwarted his escape by placing road spikes across his path… taking out the tires on his 4 wheeler.
Tom’s luck had run out. He was shot dead by a second officer who arrived on the scene… so we are told.
A medivac helicopter rushed the injured officer to hospital. Tom’s body was left where it lay.
We can only assume he was past help.
All this transpired in front of one of his kids (his oldest daughter?) who accompanied him on many of his outlaw escapades and was with him at this final showdown.
Deeply traumatising.
This was not the end most New Zealanders wanted.
It was super sad news.
Misguided or not, Tom’s plight found it’s way into the nations heart.
A desperate Father alone against the State.
We must ask… what went so wrong for Tom to believe such extreme actions were called for on his part?
Many people only have the filtered ‘official narrative’ upon which to base their conclusions… and are satisfied, yet there are other unofficial unmoderated sources of information. Social media for one where people more freely talk and share diverse opinions.
And, as I live in the Waikato where these events transpired, people here got to hear stories that are circulating on the ground… mostly from Marakopa Locals who have been living this saga in real time.
It is interesting stuff, and one thing that makes my account worth considering is I include what some locals had been saying, well before the fateful hour.
They include the rumor that some Marakopa locals believed Tom was marked for death.
They were telling people about this several months before the fateful night.
I herd about it through friends at work who used to live out there, and who had been stopped by armed police at a roadblock and questioned if they knew the whereabouts of Tom Phillips.
Interrogating the public… looking for ‘collaborators’, it’s fair to say these actions won the police little favour.
I don’t profess to be an ‘authority’ on any of this, I’m just putting things down as I herd them. I contemplate how they may explain Tom’s actions, and I consider any lessons we as a country should learn from this that might help prevent anything like this happening again.
Could there be some social good that comes from this?
Important note: *Please read my article to the very end* including Postscripts 2 and 3. There has been a particularly nasty rumor spread on-line about Tom Phillips without a shred of supporting evidence… claims that there is far more sinister doings involved in this case than what we the public has been ‘officially’ told*.
So the claim involves the police as holding facts in secret that if known would absolutely turn the public against Tom.
Yet as of the time of writing this article this claim is *nothing but hearsay*. So I discount them.
I deal with these rumours in the postscripts.
Watch/Read : NZ Herald Tom Phillips dead: Fugitive Marokopa dad shoots policeman; children found safe
For 4 years New Zealanders were ‘wowed’ by the daring exploits of this renegade Father evading Police capture and surviving in the New Zealand bush with his 3 young children.
Tom loved his kids, of this there can be no doubt, yet as time passed and Tom (allegedly) committed more crimes to sustain life on the run, the more headaches he caused the Police, and the more heat he was bringing down upon himself.
They wanted him bad, so as the years ticked by their frustration and determination grew.
Some locals suspected the Police were falsely accusing Tom of all sorts of things… a one man crime wave.
One person said to me ” If a bicycle gets stolen… the Police will claim it was Tom Phillips.”
The Police were certain Tom must be receiving help from friends helping him to evade capture.
It’s easy to posit that a strategy of blaming Tom for every crime in town was to try and turn public opinion and his alleged support base against him.
And so skepticism of the Police and their methods continued to grow.
Tom Phillip’s children, Ember ((9), Maverick (10), and Jayda (12)
People are divided in their estimation of Tom Philips, esp after a Policeman was shot.
Many automatically assume the NZ Police are the heroes, and Tom… the Villain.
Ultimately that’s a fair call given the seriousness of what transpired, and it was with the cooperation of some of the locals that Toms time on the run expired.
Still… despite everything that went down there remains a sizable minority of New Zealanders who see beyond that simplistic evaluation appreciating deeper factors at play.
They believe there is sufficient reason to suspect the NZ Police (ie legal systems) as the primary villains… Goons hired by a fundamentally corrupt system, and Tom as the victim of real injustices… and a renegade hero of sorts.
Not taking sides yet with definite empathy for Tom, I want to enunciate why IMO many New Zealanders see Tom as an almost legendary character.
He may be dead, yet his story will live on in Kiwi Folklore.
Watch this Youtube video (below).
The video (above) claims to analyze the Tom Phillips Saga.
It has a lot of details correct, and that is the main reason I’m including it in this post yet was childishly derogatory of Tom Phillips appearance, and ultimately failed to provide any explanation as to why Tom Philips acted in the way he did.
People were left to assume Tom was just a dangerous Whacko.
IMO the truth is far deeper and concerning than that.
Let me now lay down what I believe triggered Tom’s determination never to surrender his kids.
As most of us know from first hand experience, relationships are notoriously hard to maintain. Most are doomed to crash and burn… and it’s so much worse when there are kids involved.
This so often results in messy custody disputes, court orders, etc
That Tom and Cat had separated was mentioned in the video yet it still missed the fundamental reason Tom took his kids into the bush.
This was fundamentally a custody Battle.
Tom vs Cat… Tom vs Family Court.
I believe what transpired finds it’s root cause in that Tom sought to keep his children from being placed with their (alleged) drug addicted- gang related mother… ie for their safety.
He did not believe his Meth-using Ex partner was a fit mother or example.
The video completely ignored this powerful motive.
Those who support the police narrative tend to down play this essential point.
Tom was not a monster, but a loving Father motivated by his instincts to protect his kids.
This is what much of the general public believed and why many of them supported Tom.
We all know things went terribly wrong, yet originally he was not some sort of werdo-radical, but a caring father who believed (probably correctly) that the system was against him ‘
With very few options, he did what he believed at the time to be was in the best interests of his children.
Obviously he felt the Police and Courts were unjust.
And the truth is New Zealand has a poor record of Fathers rights.
Many New Zealanders know the system is rigged against fathers, so this is why they empathized with Tom.
We have a system with heavily entrench bias that never takes any cognizance of it’s own grotesque miscarriages of justice.
Most Fathers when confronted with the injustices of the Family courts feel compelled to surrender to the Powers that be.
Thousands of fathers endure years of miss-applied guilt, terrible alienation from their children, and financial ruin at the hands of IRD.
The courts are very slow to punish woman for breaches of custody agreements and court declarations.
Many despairing men die because of it.
We have a suicide epidemic in this country… more than twice as many men kill themselves than woman do… yet the official narrative is that woman are the oppressed sex in our society while men enjoy ‘privilege’. That’s what we are expected to believe.
I say the Official ‘Feminist’ narrative is obviously Bogus!
Another telling fact is that the children have not been reunited with their mother but remain in the custody of ‘Oranga Tamariki’… New Zealand’s Social services for Children. This indicates to me that even the Government is thinking twice about their mothers fitness to care for the children.
Sid Hanzlik. Photo (and story) ‘The story behind the man who took his life on parliament grounds’ here
Suicides of men in NZ… Grieving the destruction of their families, is a topic that is kept under the rug. Most go unreported.
One case was so public and shocking that it could not be ignored by the media, and I would place this death as yet another example of a Father pushed to extremes.
In 2017 Father (Sid Hanzlik) was so stricken with grief about being separated from his children that he set himself on fire on Parliament grounds in protest of his perceived injustice by the NZ Family Court… He died a horrible death, yet nothing changed.
How bad must things get before the State considers why Men are driven to extremes?
The system is broke.
Also Read: Man set himself on fire at Parliament – police
And: Coroner reports on Zdenek Hanzlik who set himself on fire at Parliament
In custody battles NZ judges habitually favor the mother. (See above chart)
This is ideological prejudice against fathers.
Most Men submit… Tom didn’t, and the rest is history.
The NZ Police were humiliated by Tom’s 4 year success at alluding capture and had put a $80 000.00 dollar reward on his head (for capture)… They harassed the locals with road blocks… stopping vehicles, etc. Asking if they had seen Tom, and tempting them with the reward.
On top of this rumor’s were circulating that the Police in fact intended to shoot him on sight… all things that might explain why Desperado Tom Philips died with his boots on… Guns blazing.
I have been mocked on social media for stating this idea… that Tom may have thought he had crossed the Rubicon and that surrendering was no longer an option.
One critic said “no such kill orders are ever issued in New Zealand”. I’m not saying any such order was issued.
I’m simply reporting *what locals were saying*… rumours that were 100% circulating in the months before the showdown.
Even if untrue it’s still possible Tom had herd them too and they may well have affected his determinations.
What a truly sad and ignomous end!
Many wonder if it really had to go down that way.
Many people do not trust the Police’s version of events… I wonder why?
We Pray for Tom’s Children, and the recovery of the injured cop.
How much more information will be forthcoming?
Will the public get any kind of transparent investigation into the handling of this case. We shall see.
No doubt they will go through the motions of reviewing how the police conducted themselves in this case… yet as always… they will find themselves vindicated.
The bigger questions about the fairness of the system towards fathers rights will go unanswered. Nothing will change… unless some political party takes up the cause, and they are unlikely to do that unless members of the public kick up a big enough stink to make it a vote winning issue.
We the public need to rally and demand better/ fair treatment of men by our legal system.
And We need to ask the Police to review how they deal with men in crisis.
There has to be better PR, better negotiations, and Less risk aversion- less fatal options for more just outcomes.
One thing is certain… pray you nor any loved one never suffers any sort of mental breakdown in this country… as presently… the way the NZ Police take care of Business… you may get shot dead… as a matter of ‘standard’ Police operational procedures.
The NZ Police Bigwigs have done their best to Demonise Tom Phillips, yet what do you expect them to say given they need to justify killing him.????
What we hear from the Police in such circumstances is not candid and forthright accounts of how things unfold… but carefully constructed narratives… omitting anything that might weaken their own position… so what we are fed is more *A Legal defense*… than the plain truth.
Will we… the public ever hear the Full unfiltered story?
Highly unlikely!
In a documentary that has been rushed into production by some journalists who were invited along on the Police Choppers etc in their operations to hunt down Tom Philips, The public have been told that The Police themselves will get to do the final edit before it is shown to the public!
They will justify this by claiming it to be necessary for the sake of any ‘ongoing investigations, and court processes… yet why would they then expect the NZ public to place any credibility on the so-called ‘documentary’ when the NZ Police will have already ‘sanitized it of any facts or opinions that might cast themselves in a bad light?
One thing is certain… Dead men tell no tales.
And: RNZ Tom Phillips’ family ‘disturbed’ documentary is being made
Steve Wallace 23. Photo The Post.
The New Zealand Police have over the past few decades been involved in many questionable shooting Deaths… yet always ‘officially’ being found to have been ‘justified’.
Two come straight to my mind. One was a Young Man smashing up shop windows with a Golf club in the small town of Waitara April 30 2000.
Steve Wallace was shot and killed, and later the NZ Police were found to have been justified in their actions, yet not so in the minds of many New Zealanders who considered his shooting as cowardly and unnecessary. Gun Ho and excessive use of force.
The pain and controversy still continues to this day.
What Steven was doing was wrong… yet does that justify what the Police did?
Read: Steven Wallace’s controversial shooting goes to UN after 25 years
One shocking report by witnesses says that after Steven was shot… the police did little or nothing to come to his aid… but left him to bleed out where he lay without any comfort.
Was this true?
If so that is extremely Cold, and I would even say a crime not to provide medical care after he had been rendered helpless and no longer a threat.
It was hearing this accusation that causes me to wonder whether Tom Phillips received any medical assistance in his final moments?
One wonders if he was in fact dead by the time the Medivac helicopter arrived on the scene?
Or was he left to die as was claimed happened to Steven Wallace?
We must await more details.
Nick Marshall and his dad Nelson Marshall. Marshall Transmissions. Photo: Peter Drury. Fairfax NZ
Another more recent questionable Police shooting comes to my mind was when NZ Police shot and killed Meth Head Nick Marshall of Hamilton, during a Dawn raid on his residence.
As this happened in my town, and I have had several conversations with people who knew him.
Being a Meth Head means no sympathy from most of the New Zealand Public who have been conditioned to think of this minority as *Sub human*… so few people cared that he died in a pool of his own blood.
I remember reading the original Waikato Times article and thinking this possibly is yet another excessive use of force by the NZ police for a non-violent offender.
The story at the time was that Nick thought he was being Home invaded by a Gang for his Drugs… this is why… according to a witness (girlfriend?) he presented his shotgun… and was shot forthwith.
Read/Watch: Police say shot man was armed
Now The Police obviously have presented *their story* and if it is to be believed… they say they clearly and loudly announced they were the Police… and according to their account Nick pulled a gun… and was shot. Simple as that. Yet The thing we all must understand is that the Police will *always* present their statements in such a way that vindicate themselves… rather than the un-glossed… un scripted facts.
Was there no other way they might have entered the premises and arrested Marshall without the need of shooting him dead?
The Dawn Raid is inherently extreme… a simple knock on the door at a reasonable hour may have achieved a far better result.
Read ‘Report’ : Fatal Police shooting of Nicholas Marshall.
I’m just asking questions… Important questions… that have bearing on what happened to Tom Phillips.
Understand that I’m not so much questioning the conduct of trained and instructed front line officers who put themselves in volatile situations … the point of the spear… I’m more concerned with the ‘Philosophy’… the politics… and the bureaucracy… of our whole system… That invisibly creates many of these altercations… like the War on Drugs… or so-called Safety rules and processes that deem it ‘justifiable’ to shoot dead a citizen suffering a highly stressful or psychotic episode.
Do people even care that our system probably is unnecessarily killing Men, and that Police officers ‘following orders’ also suffer the consequences for bad laws, unjust courts, and Bad processes?
Like the officer who was shot by Tom Phillips. They have to square off against Men who have been pushed beyond breaking point by real systemic injustice.
No one is suggesting Tom was a saint… any more than Steve Wallace or Nick Marshall.
That (allegedly) Tom involved his eldest daughter Jayda in some of his criminal activities to gain recourses for maintaining his ongoing escapade… that was callous.
That some (allegedly) involved firearms definitely raised the stakes as far as the Police were concerned. That is completely understandable.
Nobody was harmed in the perpetration of his (alleged) crimes, yet by their very nature (True or not) would justify the police to consider him armed and dangerous, and any use of force they deem necessary to bring things to a swift conclusion.
I fear Tom had resolved… Give me Liberty… or Death. It appears he had no intension of surrendering quietly… or was it that he felt that was not an option? That he was to be executed on sight?
The $100 question is why… after the road spikes had taken out his 4 wheeler… did he shoot instead of surrendering?
Did he expect no mercy… that his only option was to open fire?
It is terrible that a Police officer was shot, and badly injured.
This alone causes many Kiwis to despise Tom Philips.
They will have no truck with arguments that try to justify or excuse Tom’s actions.
I’m doing neither, yet still many will think ill of me for daring to suggest systemic injustice played a large part in that fateful night and that Tom probably felt he must shoot his way out.
Let me make it clear I abhor violence and do not advocate for violence against the Police.
I have a very close member of my family in the front line of the NZ Police Force.
Yet that does not cause me to have one eye, nor be a sycophant for the system.
I have more intelligence than that.
Thankfully we still live in a free society where we the people are allowed to question the actions of our Police and government.
I’m exercising this right.
More so it is our duty as citizens to keep an eye on how our Police conduct themselves.
Theses crucial rights are currently under assault by governments who care little for Enlightenment truths and values.
That the Police, and sheeple may consider my questioning whether Philips needed to die as some sort of character fault on my part speaks volumes about how Anti-freedom… pro-blind faith in authority many people have become.
That the Police might tag people like myself for daring to hold them to the flame as being * a radical with dangerous opinions’…. what sort of society is such Police attitudes pointing towards???
The price of Liberty is Eternal Vigilance.
We *must* always watch what the Powers that be are doing in our name.
I’m not advocating for being ‘soft on crime’. I believe in the appropriate use of force… for justice sake.
I think there is something fundamentally wrong when the Police use risk adverse strategies that result in the unnecessary slaying of civilians.
Lets hope that the NZ Justice system and Family courts wake up to their grievous injustices against Fathers.
New Zealanders need to wake up and take cognizance of the death toll on Dads caused by the present skew against men… and demand reform.
The ideology that paints men as the default abusers and woman as the default victims must be confronted for the travesty that it is.
RIP Tom Phillips.
May The grace of the Lord be with your children.
Tim Wikiriwhi.
Christian Libertarian.
Postscript:1
I Asked Grok (AI) what percentage of divorces in New Zealand are initiated by The wives vs Husbands….
Groks conclusions….
“While New Zealand lacks specific public data on divorce initiation by gender, the US’s 70-30 split (wives vs. husbands) is a reasonable proxy given similar legal and social contexts. Your points about fathers’ fears of custody loss and women’s confidence in securing custody and support are well-founded and align with international research and New Zealand’s family law patterns. The absence of precise data could stem from administrative priorities or cultural sensitivities…”
One solid reason Woman more than double the divorce initiation rate than Men in Western Nations is because of Systemic bias in their favour… against Men’s rights.
Men endure more personal pain for the sake of their kids and keeping the family together….
Grok says… “Your point about fathers enduring more pain for the sake of their children is supported by psychological research. Men are often socialized to prioritize family stability and may tolerate unhappy marriages to maintain proximity to their children. A 2016 study on divorce motivations found men are more likely to cite “staying for the kids” as a reason to avoid separation, while women are more likely to prioritize personal fulfillment.
This dynamic could amplify the 70-30 split, as fathers may avoid initiating divorce due to emotional and practical concerns, including fear of estrangement from children.”
Postscript 2.
I have become aware that another very disturbing rumour has begun to circulate of the most malicious kind… a claim so vile I hesitate to share it… even to debunk it.
I’s a depraved claim circulating on line that Tom ‘fathered’ a child (or 2) with his oldest daughter.
What a vicious thing to say!
It’s so insidious that even if proven false a tarnish remains on anyone upon whom such an accusation is made.
As things stand, I consider this to be nothing more than malicious fable.
This sort of heavy accusation demands *heavy Proof* before granting them any credence.
None whatsoever has been forthcoming.
It’s precisely the type of slander you expect to destroy a person’s standing.
So until something solid arises. I’m rejecting it outright.
If it proves false… which I most certainly expect, it will serve as a classic example of the sort of malicious character assassination that Men often.
If true… it will forever stain his name.
I can with confidence assert this disgusting rumour to be false because I must assume the police would make such information public because if true it would bolster their case.
Postscript 3. I have had a heated debate with a very Pro-police guy who tells me they 100% know with certainty that the above rumour is valid, yet that the police are keeping this secret ‘for the sake of children involved’.
This person did not like my article and said ‘I should not be talking about the case… and that they threw a copy of my article I’d left for people to read… in the bin.
This person expects me to take him at his word… without proof.
This is someone who I give a lot of credibility to… and yet I am unprepared to deem Tom Phillips as being guilty of such a hideous accusation… just on hearsay.
So until The Police release clear statements that there is a whole other level of offending involved in this case I must keep to the principle of assumed innocence until *proven* guilty.
The nature of these accusations causes people to become extremely sensitive… and angry… quick to assume the worst… and to hate anyone (like me) who prefers to wait until proof is tabled before accepting these rumours to be valid.
This is a person who I do not wish to lose as a friend, yet I can tell he does not like me even questioning the police version of events.
I do not mind that he feels so strongly about Tom Phillips being a Bad guy… he has his reasons… Yet it saddens me that he thinks less of me simply because I prefer to wait for more substance before I outright condemn Tom Phillips.
I reserve judgement.
On the question of the Publics right to know.
As I consider the idea that the police might believe it to be justified to keep the NZ public in the dark about certain aspects of this case… ‘for the sake of children’… I’m sorry but that smacks of bullshit to me. That does not mean it is BS… what it means is that the very idea that *the police* get to decide what they tell the public rather than full disclosure… causes the public to lose confidence on them. We Citizens have a right to know the full story so that we can have confidence that our police are behaving in a fully ethical manner. What have they got to hide?
It’s like what happened with The Christchurch Terror attack. The whole business was covered up. There was no public court case in which The people got to hear the defense of the accused.
His ‘Manifesto’ was made illegal to download, read, and share… all we have is the Crowns/ Polices version of events. The reason they said they must suppress all information and leave the public in the dark? ” Because it might cause a copy cat crime”.!!! I shit you not! That is supposed to satisfy the people of New Zealand as a reason why the government is going to hide the truth from us… and make it almost a crime to even talk about it.
………….
More from Tim…
Heart Ripped out. This ones for all the Dying Dads … and the Survivors.
Ruff Draft.
To be delivered tomorrow some time between 2-2.30pm via Zoom link.
As I only get 5 minutes I’ll have to trim this down….
Tim Wikiriwhi speaking at another event.
Kia Ora.
I am Tim Wikirwhi.
Of the Arawa waka
I emphatically support the Treaty Principles Bill, and look forward to a future day when the false doctrines of Treaty separatism have been tossed into the wastebasket of history.
What is this Treaty Principles Bill fundamentally about?
Some people will say it’s about figuring out the correct relationship between Maori and Pakeha .. and there are strong conflicting opinions about that.
I contend this is not truly fundamental instead the point of this bill is to dig down through nearly 200 years and present to the New Zealand people concisely *What the Historically objective meaning of the Treaty of Waitangi *Really was* according to those who penned the document, Then explained it’s meaning to the Maori Chiefs, who then debated whether or not they should sign it… And sign it they did.
That is all that matters… that we get to the historical truth!
It matters not whether we approve or disapprove of the historical truth about the Treaty… our feelings must be kept separate from this investigation so that the objective truth may be understood… and upheld… regardless of whether that Truth is convenient… or politically correct… or nice… or nasty.
Too many people involved in this Bill are not being honest or objective but seek to re-interpret the Treaty in ways that serve their own interests and bias.
That is dishonest and Corrupt!
If you want to understand Te Triti O Waitangi… all you need to do is go read the Littlewood Treaty!
Yes we have the original English draft of the Treaty… in the hand of James Busby… and when you compare Te Tiriti O Waitangi to the Littlewood draft I have been assured by experts they are a perfect match.
I call this committee to enter the Littlewood Treaty as evidence to the true meaning of Te Tiriti O Waitangi.
Please don’t pretend that important historical document has no relevance to this bill!
It was from the Littlewood document that Henry Williams translated Te Tiriti O Waitangi.
So it is fundamental!
The Littlewood Treaty clearly states… article 1. ‘The chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes and the other chiefs who have not joined the confederation, cede to the Queen of England for ever the entire Sovreignty [sic] of their country.’
Secondly we have recorded history of Governor Hobson clearly stating when shaking the hand of every chief after they had signed the treaty… “He Iwi Tahi Tatou” “We are now one people”.
That clearly embodies the spirit of the Treaty.. the very day it was signed.
My time is short. I have one other piece of historical evidence… *Hold Up 50 Dollar Bill*
See this image on this bank note!
It is of a truly great man… A Statesman… Sir Aparana Ngata.
Of historical mana that has no equal today.
In his speech at the Centennial celebrations of the Treaty of Waitangi on February 6, 1940 he said:
“Let me say one thing. Clause 1 of the Treaty handed over the mana and the sovereignty of New Zealand to Queen Victoria and her descendants forever. That is the outstanding fact today. That but for the shield of the sovereignty handed over to Her Majesty and her descendants I doubt that there would be a free Māori race in New Zealand today.”
This quote reflects Ngata’s perspective that Māori chiefs, by signing the Treaty, transferred sovereignty to the British Crown, a view he also expressed in other writings, such as his 1922 booklet The Treaty of Waitangi: An Explanation. There, he elaborated on the first article of the Treaty, stating that the chiefs ceded “the Government of all their lands” to the Queen, interpreting this as a complete transfer of authority or sovereignty.”
There you have it!
This is the opinion of one of The Maori Peoples greatest champions of the Colonial era.
Succinct and unequivocal.
Yet today we have powerful political vested interest groups who have spend decades falsifying history… seeking to muddy the waters about the True meaning of the Treaty… for their own gain… at the expense of all New Zealanders but themselves. They have ensnared many common Maori people, embroiling them in a diabolical and fraudulent political scheme that now holds our entire nation to ransom. This Brings shame, weakness, and degradation upon the Maori People… not honour… not strength!
Let us end these lies now!
Appreciate this Fact! Today All Kiwi of Maori ancestry … like myself… we all.. also share Pakeha Blood in our veins too!
The spirit of the Treaty has become Flesh and Blood… we are now literally one mixed blood!
How is it that scheming politicians seek to politically divide our Nation when in truth to do so we must deny history and our own biological truth!
I say We are all whanau now!
Let us Free the Maori people, and all New Zealanders from the Fraud of Treaty separatism and acknowledge we are all created equal and that *as one people*… New Zealanders… that Racial equality before the Law is essential for justice in our land… and that is what the Treaty Truthfully established here under British Rule of Law.
Thank you for hearing my submission.
I make myself available to the committee for any further assistance I might be for the purpose of Due process for this Bill.
**************
Tim Wikiriwhi.
Christian Libertarian.
More from Tim…
Principles of The Treaty Of Waitangi Bill. Submission By Tim Wikiriwhi. (Written submission)
Big Hui: Kingites Plot Social Unrest To Maintain Racist Treaty separatism @ Turangawarwae .
A Submission In Opposition To The Electoral (Entrenchment Of Maori Seats) Amendment Bill
TIM WIKIRIWHI’S SUBMISSION TO THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW. 2013
MT EVEREST IS FOR WIMPS! LETS CONQUER APARTHEID GOVERNMENT IN NEW ZEALAND! A STRATEGY.
UNIVERSAL PRIDE IN WASHINGTON, SEPARATIST SHAME IN WELLINGTON.
Asking Grok (X AI)
Bill Ludbrook sent me a copy of his submission in support of Act’s Treaty Principles Bill, and gave me permission to share it here at Eternal Vigilance and elsewhere.
It is significant in that Bill steps up in defense of the true meaning of Te Tiriti O Waitangi… translated from the English ‘Littlewood Draft’… by the hand of his Great Great Grandfather… Chief Missionary Henry Williams in 1840.
Henry Williams looms large in this pivotal period of our nations history.
It is outrageous that modern revisionists place themselves… and their interpretation of the meaning of Maori Words over and above this Great man who was not only contemporary with the times, but also his Brother ‘William Williams’ authored The Maori Dictionary!
As Bill says in his submission… “Henry Williams will be ‘turning in his grave’ at the current absurdities of the situation.”
Bill also makes a very truthful claim about the Treaty being ‘Redundant’… It ought to be… yet that is a discussion for another hour.
The debate today is about what is the true meaning of the Treaty?
Why are the ‘Treaty Principles’ enacted in 1975 False?
Read Bill’s sub (below)…
Tim Wikiriwhi
Christian Libertarian.
To: The Select Committee – Treaty Principles Bill Submission.
Dated: Monday 2nd December 2024.
Introduction:
My name is William (Bill) Ludbrook and I am a descendant of Henry Williams.
I support David Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill, because it uncomplicates an ancient Maori document that nobody understands, if they ever did understand it at any given time?
In February 1840, New Zealand’s first Governor, Captain William Hobson of England, asked Henry Williams to translate Queen Victoria’s Treaty offer to New Zealand, into the Maori language to become known as “Te Tiriti o’ Waitangi”.
Summary:
The Te Tiriti o’ Waitangi in its existing form, has now become redundant.
It remains controversial, it is ineffective, it is shameful, it is embarrassing, it is divisive, and it does not represent New Zealanders well in 2024 or 184 years after its date of execution between Rangatira and New Zealand’s first British Governor William Hobson in 1840.
My grandfather of two greats, Henry Williams, will be ‘turning in his grave’ at the current absurdity of the situation in New Zealand regarding “his Tiriti o’ Waitangi”
The ‘twisting and changing’ interpretations of our foundation document in New Zealand, by the Waitangi Tibunal and others, has been dramatic, inaccurate, and unacceptable!
The representatives of Queen Victoria would never have signed a Treaty in Queen Victoria’s name, without guaranteeing her full Sovereignty over that colony. To say otherwise is part of the absurdity emanating from some sectors of NZ today.
The Treaty of Waitangi was translated into the Maori language in 1840, for one solitary reason, and that is Rangatira Maori did not understand any language except the Maori language, especially as something as important as a Treatywith the British Royal Crown!
Obviously today in 2024, it is an entirely different proposition.
Every single Maori on this planet clearly understands the English language.
Henry William’s Maori version, referred to as te Tiriti o’ Waitangi, was signed by over 500 Maori Chiefs and Ariki throughout the country of New Zealand.
Only 39 Chiefs signed Queen Victoria’s English version.
To answer the reasons for this, we need to go back to the Treaty of Waitangi and compare what the English Treaty said originally, with what tribal representatives, ‘inept Waitangi Tribunal members’, and many ‘history ignorant’ politicians today say it says.
The final English draft from which the Treaty in Maori was written by Henry Williams, is called the Littlewood draft.
It has this name because this draft was given to a lawyer by the name of Henry Littlewood by James Busby and Hobson to check over the Treaty draft in English.
Henry Littlewood who was present in the Bay of Islands in the 1830s and 1840s is presumed to have had some association with the actors involved in the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi. This said document is written on paper watermarked as 1833 and is dated 4th of February 1840. This was the day Henry Williams was given the Treaty to translate into Maori. It has also now been confirmed as being in Busby’s handwriting. Therefore, the Littlewood Treaty draft in English, mirrors the official versions.
It went missing and was found in Auckland in 1989 (Nineteen Eighty-Nine) among family records belonging to the descendants of Henry Littlewood.
“The Fair Colony” (By Bruce Moon, New Zealand, Historian and Author, Second Edition, p6) confirmed it was the final original English draft. However, under pressure from activists, aided by various politicians, it was quickly taken out of sight by government officials and hidden away to this day.
When one compares the Treaty in Maori with the Littlewood Draft, we could say they are identical.
This is how historians can tell it was the Littlewood final draft that was used to draw up the Treaty in Maori by Henry Williams in 1840.
If you want to know what the Treaty in Maori says in English, then read the Littlewood draft.
Following, are the three Articles of the Treaty from this said Littlewood draft.
These articles are simple, and very easy to understand.
Preamble:
“Her Majesty Victoria, Queen of England in her gracious consideration for the Chiefs and people of New Zealand, and her desire to preserve them their land and to maintain peace and order amongst them, has been pleased to appoint an officer to treat with them for the cession of the Sovereignty (sic) of their country and the islands of their country and of the islands adjacent to the Queen.
Seeing that already many of her Majesty’s subjects have already settled in the country and are constantly arriving, and that it is desirable for their protection as well as the protection of the natives to establish a government amongst them.
Her Majesty has accordingly been pleased to appoint me William Hobson a Captain of the Royal Navy to be Governor of such parts of New Zealand as may now or hereafter be ceded to Her Majesty and proposes to the Chiefs of the Confederation of United Tribes of New Zealand and the other Chiefs to agree to the following Articles”:
Article One:
“The Chiefs of the Confederation of United Tribes, and other chiefs who have not joined the Confederation, cede to the Queen of England forever the entire Sovereignty of their country”
Article two:
“The Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and the tribes and to all the people of New Zealand, the possession of their lands, dwellings, and all their property. But the Chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes and the other Chiefs grant to the Queen, the exclusive rights of purchasing such lands as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to sell at such prices as may be agreed upon between them and the person appointed by the Queen to purchase from them”
Article 3.
“In return for the cession of their Sovereignty to the Queen, the people of New Zealand shall be protected by the Queen of England and the rights and privileges of British subjects will be granted to them” end.
That is a clear, uncomplicated, easy to understand, Treaty of Waitangi.
Yet, what do we see today? A toxic culture of division being perpetrated by activists who are only interested in causing resentment. Instead of celebrating the benefits of a shared heritage, one that includes Western advancements that raised the standard of living for everyone. These agitators push for separatism. Co-governance, race-based laws, and constant demands for ‘decolonisation’ are going to rip our social fabric apart.
Here’s the truth: no nation can survive on the basis of two separate legal systems, one for one race and one for another. That’s not equality, it’s apartheid, plain and simple. And what makes it worse, is that this divisive ideology is being peddled under the guise of liberal ‘justice’. It’s not liberal and it’s not justice, it’s Maori supremacy, brought to you mainly by a number of present day new generation Maori.
We need to reject this path and embrace the only principles that made New Zealand a success: equality before the law, individual rights, and a shared national identity. We should respect Maori heritage, but respect isn’t achieved by bending the knee to historical grievances or rewriting the rules of governance to privilege one group over many others.
Maori culture, like Western culture, is worth preserving, and not through racial favouritism or endless guilt-tripping about colonisation. It’s preserved through genuine pride, mutual respect, and the recognition that we’re all citizens of the same country.
Kiwis are some of the most patriotic people you’ll ever meet. There’s a pride that runs deep in this country, pride in our way of life, pride in the freedoms we enjoy, and pride in the fact that we’ve created a society which, despite its flaws, is still one of the best in the world to live in. We’re fiercely protective of our home, our culture and our shared history.
So, when we talk about Maori and Pakeha relations, it’s important to remember that the vast majority of New Zealanders, regardless of their background, are united in their love for this country.
They want a future where we can all live side by side as equals, without the need
for separate laws or separate systems of governance.
This isn’t about ignoring the past or rejecting the Treaty, it’s about building a future that reflects the reality of what New Zealand is today: a diverse but unified country, where every person, regardless of their ancestry, has the same rights and accountabilities.
The reality is, most Kiwis want the same thing, respect for Maori culture and respect for our European heritage which gave us a parliament (and everything else). It’s time to stop using history as a weapon to divide us. New Zealand should be better than this.
I support David Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill simply for reasons of clarity.
Also, what appears as conceivable and sensible and reasonable, is we already have a perfectly clear Treaty of Waitangi currently in our possession in the form of the said “Littlewood draft” which is already in the English language and will inevitably be clearly understood by every single New Zealander.
This may not be accepted because it may conjure an absurdity of being too simplistic, too easy, and too sensible to consider. On the other hand, it may be seen in the spirit and simplicity it is written.
Background to the author of this submission:
Archdeacon Henry William’s daughter Caroline, was my grandfather, Henry Ludbrook’s Mother.
My family were all born and bred on the same ‘sacred land’ at Pouerua, Pakaraka, and Taiamai, Bay of Islands, which Henry Williams purchased from 16 powerful Ngapuhi Chiefs and Ariki, including Hone Heke, in 1833.
Dr Aidan Challis of the Science and Research Division of the Department of Conservation, describes Pouerua as a “World Class Cultural Monument”
In his 20 years involvement with ‘Heritage Protection’ he says that “Pouerua and the main cone and associated lava, is a historical landscape of outstanding significance”
He says “Although there were once large horticultural Maori settlements throughout New Zealand, all but Pouerua have been destroyed”
“This special place” has a unique ancient archaeological history that has been designated by famous researchers as being one of the world’s largest, most intact unspoilt archaeological sites, anywhere in the world!
Dr Aidan Challis said “It could be likened to Hadrian’s Wall in England, or the Pyramids in Egypt, or the Colosseum in Rome, dating back to around 1200AD.
“It remains intact and unspoilt as it was during human (Maori) occupation hundreds of years ago”
“Pouerua, through the benign management practices of the Williams and Ludbrook families for 191 years has meant full protection of Pouerua has been allowed to occur”
Ownership of this subject land was passed down to Henry William’s Ludbrook grandsons over many generations.
Parts of this special place are still farmed by the Ludbrook family to this present day in 2024.
Closing comments:
Henry Williams, as an ex Royal Navy officer, arrived in NZ in 1823 from Britain to Head the Church Missionary Society of New Zealand.
In subsequent years, in 1840 he was to become known and revered by Maori throughout New Zealand for his courage as a Missionary and peacemaker, and always his intentions and willingness to help Maori deal with the tidal wave of lawless European pakeha settlers around this time.
He was recognised by Maori throughout the country and early settlers in New Zealand as being fearless. He feared his God and therefore had no fear of men.
On February 6th 1840, 40 Ngapuhi Chiefs signed the Treaty of Waitangi, at Waitangi, Bay of Islands, Northland, New Zealand.
Queen of England Victoria’s English version was translated into Maori by the Head of the Church Missionary Society of New Zealand, Henry Williams, and it has been known in this country ever since as Te Tiriti o’ Waitangi.
Any weak-kneed approach to the Treaty Principles Bill from anyone is exactly what NZ does not need!
At a time when Kiwis are yearning for strong leadership, that stands up for unity and fair-mindedness, Hon. David Seymour appears to possess all of those qualities required for these purposes!
Bill Ludbrook
Pakaraka,
Bay of Islands, New Zealand.
More from Tim…
Principles of The Treaty Of Waitangi Bill. Submission By Tim Wikiriwhi.
Big Hui: Kingites Plot Social Unrest To Maintain Racist Treaty separatism @ Turangawarwae .
A Submission In Opposition To The Electoral (Entrenchment Of Maori Seats) Amendment Bill
TIM WIKIRIWHI’S SUBMISSION TO THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW. 2013
MT EVEREST IS FOR WIMPS! LETS CONQUER APARTHEID GOVERNMENT IN NEW ZEALAND! A STRATEGY.
UNIVERSAL PRIDE IN WASHINGTON, SEPARATIST SHAME IN WELLINGTON.
Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill.
Public Submission.
To the committee.
Hello.
My name is Tim Wikirwihi.
I am a father, grandfather, a Christian Libertarian, and a Kiwi of both Maori and Pakeha descent.
Te Arawa is my Iwi.
In my daily affairs I never feel the need to mention my Maori ancestry, or Iwi as I do not see any relevance in my dealings with others.
In my work (I am a self employed engineer), or any other affairs I am simply Tim Wikiriwhi, and I expect others to interact with me simply on the basis of common humanity and my own reputation and character… not my race, yet given the nature of this Bill, and the position I stand for, I believe this is one of the few times that it is appropriate to mention my tribal affiliation because it adds an important context to my submission that I believe is essential for this committee to appreciate.
I am a representative of a substantial demographic that many pretend does not exist.
I am a New Zealander of Maori blood who emphatically supports this Treaty principles Bill and urge the committee to recommend it be passed into law.
Given Truth and Justice for our nation are at stake I think that it is vital for your committee to appreciate that there are many Maori like myself who stand with our fellow non-Maori countrymen earnestly desiring an end to the false doctrines of ‘Treaty separatism’, and a restoration of the true principles of the treaty that established a single Crown government over all peoples of New Zealand and that it guaranteed *Equality of rights* before the Law… for us all… As British subjects.
The Treaty did not establish a perpetual racial division.
It did not created a partnership of ‘shared governance’.
The Maori Chiefs ceded sovereignty to the British Crown.
These are the historical facts.
They are supported by mountains of documentation and recorded statements of such giants of Maoridom Sir Aparana Ngata, and evidence is plentiful in the Archives of the British and New Zealand Governments.
We even have the original English manuscript of the Treaty… penned by James Busby from which Te Tiriti o Waitangi was translated and transcribed.
The Littlewood Treaty.
Wars were fought and won to uphold the Sovereignty of the British Crown as written in the Treaty of Waitangi.
‘Treaty partnership’ as we know it today is a modern malicious political construct that exhumes dangerous racist rebellious delusions that had long been put to rest as a Nation resulting in prosperity, peace and unity.
Racist subversives have succeeded in hijacking our Nation and stirring up Race hate afresh.
These are facts… not opinions… embedded in historical realty.
To deny these is to falsify history and facilitate political fraud that was foisted upon our nation in 1975.
50 years of Heavy political favour has not lifted Maori out of their dire social statistics because it utterly fails to address the real causes of their plight!
It is not institutional racism that keeps Maori down, But institutional welfarism and dependence!
Maori need to take ownership and responsibility for their own crimes and poor health, and quit blaming everybody else… but themselves.
This is the key to breaking the social malaise that rests upon them, and will continue to do so as long as Treaty separatism and the grievance industries hold sway.
These blights on our Country require ongoing Racial strife for fuel.
This is the expertise of Radical Leftist Marxism.
The wave of ‘Anti-colonialism’/ calls for ‘decolonisation’ are a shameful slander upon the Good and Heroic Pioneers and Colonists who built this country not by thefts and oppression, but by sweat, toil, and virtue!
Making this Country the envy of the world and the envy of the racist radicals who are using political extortion to plunder our nation for themselves!
David Seymour (who is of Maori Descent) has boldly submitted this Bill for Parliament to consider as a first step in bringing this nasty Politics of race to heel.
One of the biggest hurdles to this Bill being made Law is not the justness of it’s cause… but the existence of the Maori Seats in Parliament that have been the preserve and Powerbase for Maori Racists, Radicals, and extremists over the past 50 years.
Being a constant thorn in the side of any government who is not pandering to their demands.
When seeking to challenge any aspect of racial separatism, it takes heroic strength. integrity, and fortitude to weather the storm of vitriol that blows from the Racists occupying the Maori seats, yet who also enjoy a wall of security… protected from facing the just retaliation from the Non-Maori New Zealander voters they slander and extort by the perversion of our democracy… The Race based Electoral Roll.
They can Lie, and slander, and disrespect the bulk of the New Zealand citizenry without regard… for the Non-Maori people have no means by which they can vote them out.
Appalled by this situation many Maori like myself who reject the vile politics of race are not registered on the Maori roll.
We choose to stand as equals beside our Non-Maori Countrymen on the General roll.
And most grievous of all. Very often the Separate Maori seats hold the balance of power and so the Separatists revel in the opportunity to play ‘king makers’.
They are able to exact a high price for their support, playing the National Party and Labour party off against each other.
In their frenzy for power National and Labour then engage in selling out the rest of New Zealand to the demands of those holding the Maori seats.
This is how the separatist Seats corrupt our entire democracy and keeps our nation perpetually divided, and Maori in a state of Grievance, victimhood, and welfare dependence.
There is no end to this is sight unless New Zealanders wake up and demand Parliament fixes this disgusting racist travesty.
Yet herein lies the dilemma.
Any Coalition Gov that would move to end this travesty as Act is doing with this Treaty Principles Bill that we are considering today… must contend with the huge backlash that will ensue from the racist radicals in the Maori seats.
Hikios from Hell.
Hakas in the house, etc.
Vandalism of colonial monuments, etc.
Terrorism that causes feeble Governments to falter.
To repeat my assertion I made above IMO the biggest hurdle to this Bill being made Law is not the justness of it’s cause… but the existence of the Maori Seats in Parliament.
This is where I call out New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.
Luxon has already said he will not allow National party MP to support this Bill past this stage of the process.
He intends to sink this bill… without even considering Submissions made by the New Zealand Public!
What arrogance!
Luxon does not have the spine to weather the slanders and angst that he fears will be his fate should he support this Bill.
Luxon knows that if He supports this Bill that next election the Maori Radicals will support a Labour led coalition government… so he is not considering this Bill on its merits… but on what the consequences possibly could be for the National party should he support it.
Should he continue on this path not only is his position immoral, not only will it cement his name in NZ history as being yet another facilitator of racist politics… that shall be his legacy and I believe he is making a massive strategic political blunder!
He’s misreading the temper of the New Zealand Public!
We the people of New Zealand have had enough of living in a two tier race based society and We will not forgive Luxon and National for siding with Te Pati Maori against his own coalition partner Act.
New Zealand put this coalition in office to address this issue in the light of what Jacinda Ardern was doing with Three Waters and The He Pua Pua Report, and it is something he said he would do!
Yet now he is reneging on his commitment. We will not forget this.
Support will bleed away from National towards Act.
You can be certain of it.
This Bill puts Act in the ascendency.
National would do well to support it thereby shoring up their own support.
Luxon underestimates just how angry New Zealanders are with the way things have been going… turning our country into an Apartheid Nation.
We have had it with the lies and extortion and the brainwashing going on in ours schools… the falsifying of history to condition the next generations of Kiwi into accepting being rendered second class subjects in their own Country.
Luxon claims to be focused on the economy and deludes himself that he can ignore this Cancerous growth in our Nations side.
If he cared about social justice and the economic condition of Maori he would support this bill as the establishment of One Citizenship, One law for all is absolutely essential for social justice… the first step to ending Maori dependence on the welfare state and embracing the philosophy of Self reliance *as individuals* for their own betterment.
For they must pull themselves out of the mire by their own bootstraps… no longer clinging to the apron of Nanny State.
They must learn and embrace good values and work ethics… these are essential if they are to shrug off crime.
This Treaty Principles Bill if passed into law will be the first step in the road to establishing One Citizenship, One law for all.
Ie establishing Justice and ending the false Treaty principles and extortion that has grown up from them.
To follow will be the abolishment of the Maori Seats in Parliament and the Race Based Electoral system.
Maori Politicians then will have to stand for election on the general roll and be accountable to all the people of New Zealand for their policies and utterances.
As a Maori I look forward to that day and will take personal pride in having raised my voice in advocacy for the True principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.
That is the New Zealand I remember from my Childhood, and the New Zealand I wish to bequeath to my children’s children.
One New Zealand.
Equality for All.
Regards.
Tim Wikiriwhi.
More from Tim.
Big Hui: Kingites Plot Social Unrest To Maintain Racist Treaty separatism @ Turangawarwae .
A Submission In Opposition To The Electoral (Entrenchment Of Maori Seats) Amendment Bill
TIM WIKIRIWHI’S SUBMISSION TO THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW. 2013
MT EVEREST IS FOR WIMPS! LETS CONQUER APARTHEID GOVERNMENT IN NEW ZEALAND! A STRATEGY.
UNIVERSAL PRIDE IN WASHINGTON, SEPARATIST SHAME IN WELLINGTON.
Not all Black People are Poor.
Not all White people are Rich.
Not all Black people are criminals.
Not all White people are honest.
It’s a question of Values and ethics… not race.
Good values and ethics tends to Self responsibility. hard work, thrift and avoidance of Vice.
All this tends towards prosperity and higher quality of life. It tends towards being trusted… good business relations.
These people function well in freedom.
They vote pro-freedom… low taxes.
The person with poor values and ethics rarely has the integrity to admit their woes are mostly of their own doing… because of their own poor choices.
They rather tend to shift the blame onto others… and claim they are the victims of oppression.
It’s as simple as that.
They want government hand outs.
Statistics prove Black Americans, and Maori New Zealanders… lack Good values and ethics.
That is why they have terrible social statistics… not because of racial prejudice.
These sorry types are also preyed upon by Far left socialists who feed their envy and malice and use them as political footballs for their own political gains.
These ‘blamers’ vote far Left.
Blacks with good ethics rise above their peers.
Maori who migrate to Australia and elsewhere do well for themselves… because they tend to be individuals who are prepared to work for their own betterment rather than wallowing in self pity and blame.
Whites with poor Values and ethics suffer the same fate … they live in poverty… they tend towards crime… they blame others for their lot in life… and vote Left.
The other group of Left voting whites are the chumps who feel guilty about belonging to the demographic that enjoys the higher standards of living and believe the Leftist Bullshit that the reason they do so is because they belong to the ‘oppressor class’. They are too stupid to understand the dynamics of Freedom and Self responsibility.
Tim Wikiriwhi.
Christian Libertarian.
More from Tim…
Christian X user asks the question… “Should Porn be allowed on this platform?”
Public nudity in a free and civil society has always been a contentious issue. Even the discussion of Sex is contentious.
As a Libertarian Christian I have defended the rights of Sex workers, and Public parades such as ‘Boobs on Bikes’ from Oppressive Councils and laws that were under pressure to prohibit these things largely from Christian activist lobby groups.
Some people will wonder how as a Christian I might take such a position? I take that position because I believe in a separation of church and state, and I do not like Christianity and the bible being used as a bludgeon to persecute sinners and infidels. I believe that to be absolutely Unchristian, and also a corruption of the Law… and a violation of individual rights.
Many anti-freedom people think that by taking the side of prostitutes that I am endorsing prostitution, yet that is false. I do not want anyone (man or woman) to prostitute themselves, yet that does not mean I therefore should support laws against them.
I believe In liberty.. as a Libertarian Christian we have far more hope of saving people from prostitution if we show love for them rather than hateful oppression. Christians can still work to reduce prostitution via the gospel… which is the true Christian way to battle sin and improve the world…. all under freedom.
Now I said all this here to give context to the question raised above. Porn in Western society may be construed as being anything from showing a nipple… to full on Sex. I personally am not bothered by the former being allowed in public yet would be very bothered by the latter… so even Libertarian Tim thinks there must be a line drawn *somewhere*.
Myself… applying the principle of Equality before the law when supporting ‘Boobs parades in Hamilton’ was that if men are allowed to walk topless down the street so too should woman be lawfully allowed to. Instead of allowing woman to do so, we could instead simply create a new prohibition against men having bare chests…. yet is this the best direction for society… less freedom… more laws/rules/punishments? It’s obvious to me thats the wrong direction to take society… that leads to what is happening in the Islamic world with Burkas and Beard police.
The truth is Christians need to be tolerant of others who do not share *all* the same values and sentiments we do… yet who are still peaceful and civil. Ie seeing a boob on the street you may find offensive (I don’t) but is certainly does not violate any of your rights!
If we were to apply that to social media platforms and boobs were allowed… then anyone offended by it could scroll past that post… and even block the sender of the post…. thereby *self policing* their own content without imposing their views on others. And this is how a free and civil society really works. Tolerance… and Individuals taking responsibility for their own moral standards rather than expecting the government to act like the Taliban.
X could set up an ‘R18’ tab (maybe they already do) and users could click that tab to prevent any R18 content appearing in their feed. They probably already do this… I’m not sure. I’m fairly certain most x users don’t want explicit porn turning up in their feed, yet I’m sure the odd boob pick from a chick on the back of a motor cycle does not bother too many people????
Ultimately such questions are for the Platforms themselves to figure out… yet if they get it wrong It would impact on their User satisfaction and cause people to leave. Lets say X allowed nudity yet not explicit sex acts… at first some millions who cant handle the sight of a boob to leave. That would be an expected cost. yet eventually those numbers would recover and users would just take such stuff in their stride like adults. And personally speaking I think that is progress… an escape from the petty legalistic prudish attitudes that still support Legal oppression under the guise of Christian virtue.
If nudity was allowed on X that would not mean Christians could no longer maintain their own virtues. They might face more ‘temptation’… yet it would be up to them to overcome that as all Christian ought. Ironically It’s the more Pious types that have the most problem when confronted with a boob! Everyone else just laughs… or scrolls past.
That’s my 5 cents. 🙂
Tim Wikirwihi.
Christian Libertarian.
More from Tim…
Standing up for Justice more important than Personal Ambitions
Feminism, Lisa Lewis, and the death of romance.
True Christian Modus Operandi. Jesus Loves Porn Stars.
The Doomed HMNZ Manawanui . 6 October. Samoa. Photo from here
WHEN WILL THE NAVY EVER LEARN?
By John McLean, author of “A Mission of Honour; The Royal Navy in the Pacific, 1769-1997”.
In my article of a couple of days ago on the HMNZS Manawanui disaster, entitled “Is The Navy Fit For Purpose?”, I raised the issue of the perceived over-promotion of minority groups in the services at the expense of the efficiency of our defence forces.
Speculation is rife throughout the country as in both general conversation and on social media (usually a truer reflection of opinion than the mainstream media) the suspicion is that the captain of HMNZS Manawanui, Commander Yvonne Gray, was over-promoted because she ticked the boxes of being both female and lesbian.
Instead of facing this issue and providing some facts to rebut such a presumption the Navy has compounded the problem by appointing as chair of the Inquiry into the disaster yet another person who can only too easily be perceived to be another of its over-promoted women – in this case Commodore Melissa Ross, who also ticks the boxes that seem to be more and more important in naval promotions – in her case being both female and part-Maori.
So passionate is she about the importance of promoting women in the Navy (apparently because they are women rather than on merit) that the Navy website of 6 December, 2019, stated of her: “She is passionate about the development of women in the military and was co-chair of the N.Z. Defence Force’s Women’s Development Steering Group, which she helped create”.
She gave away her prejudices in her own words: “With women in the Navy, we still have work to do to create the environment where they can thrive” (presumably at the expense of men). And yet the speaker of this sexist nonsense has been appointed by her fellow feminist, Judith Collins, to investigate the sinking of the Manawanui by another woman officer, Yvonne Gray whose ability to tick various boxes is widely believed to have been the reason for her rapid promotion to command of the $100 million vessel that, under her command, sank in Samoan waters.
How could anyone have faith in such an Inquiry, headed by one who appears to be so fanatically committed to her fellow female officers as to bring her objectivity into doubt? Commodore Ross is the very last person who should be involved in an inquiry into the sinking of the Manawanui. Much of the blame for this continuing “train crash” can be laid at the feet of Judith Collins who, as Minister of Defence, was responsible for appointing her fellow feminist, Melissa Ross, to head the inquiry.
Instead of trying to rebut the obvious presumption that Yvonne Gray might have been appointed to command due to her ability to tick certain boxes of political correctness that the Navy apparently now deems so essential to promotion, Judith Collins resorted to smear tactics, which are always easier than giving truthful answers to allegations. Those who dared to point out that the purpose of the Navy is to defend the country and that this can best be achieved by promotion on merit rather than gender/sexual orientation were damned by Collins as “misogynists” and “armchair admirals”.
The Inquiry seems to be organised so that the Navy can protect its own back as well as its policies, including – and especially – the criteria for promotion in this ever more feminine (and feminist) service. As Peter Cresswell pointed out on his Not PC Blog “An inquiry by the Navy about the Navy doesn’t give confidence that we’ll ever know much more”.
The New Zealand Navy is a small affair where everybody knows everybody else and that is especially true of the coterie of powerful female officers who all seem to be of the same stripe – of advancing women (and covering up for them?) at the expense of men. Obviously Melissa Ross and Yvonne Gray know each other – probably very well. If a litigant in court is known to the judge, that is always pointed out and the judge will normally remove himself from the case. So why not follow this rule for the naval Inquiry?
For an Inquiry to be credible in should be headed by the Judge Advocate of the Armed Forces with two others: one from Britain’s Royal Navy and the other from the Royal Australian Navy. Only then could the public, whose taxes have to pay for a $130 million replacement vessel, have confidence in the outcome of the Inquiry. The choice of Melissa Ross to head it is yet another example of Judith Collins’ notoriously bad judgement. Former Defence Minister, Ron Mark, would never have made such a blunder.
Not surprisingly, the continuing absence of any meaningful information from the Navy has fuelled the rumour mill. One of these rumours is that Yvonne Gray’s “wife”, Sharon, was also on board the Manawanui when she sank. This is either true or false; it would be helpful if the Navy (or its Minister) would either confirm or deny it. As the well-paid Minister of Defence, Judith Collins has a lot of questions to answer and merely smearing those who ask them is not good enough. This thing is becoming a bigger mess by the day.
Above picture from New Zealand’s Free Speech Union
From the free Speech Union…. here.
The Department of Internal Affairs has released proposals seeking significant content regulation for media and online platforms. We must push back to keep our internet and press free:
The Discussion Document here.
They are at it again! This Labour government might be about to be kicked into touch yet they are hell bent of attacking Free speech and controlling On=line content via creating a new un-unelected Censorship Authority to carry on wreaking havoc on our country after they have lost supreme power.
Opportunity to make a submission against this latest attack closes at Midnight tonight 30-7-23.
There is still time!
The quickest way to make a submission in time is to follow the Free speech Unions ‘Easy step’ submission generator.
Or go to the discussion documents ‘Feedback’ function. here.
Answer their questions the best you can.
The final section allows you to add your own submission in your own words.
Any submission resisting the curtailment of Free speech is better than doing nothing and allowing these evil power to rob us of Free speech without challenge.
Free Speech is Essential!
The Globalists and Woke Socialists are hell bent on suppressing their opposition by force of Law.
We cannot let that happen.
That is to surrender our country to Marxist tyranny!
666
Special thanks to ‘Hobson’s Pledge’ and The New Zealand free Speech Union for alerting Me to what was afoot.
The Government tried to sneak this through!
A Poll discovered only 25% of New Zealanders were aware this was coming down the pipeline.
Most transparent Government eva! Tui Ad. (Yeah Right!)
Without question This Labour Government has been the most dishonest and sleazy and disastrous in our entire history!
My submission was been rushed… as usual, and so contains my usual writing, spelling and grammatical crimes… Long winded… repetitious… waffling.
I have edited and corrected many errors in the draft below that embarrassingly still exist in my real sub, yet could not bear to let them stand…
Apologies.
Please read on…
*****
This is my submission.
30-7-23.
On the Proposals for a New Regulatory Body within the Safer On-line Services and Media Platforms Discussion Document.
To the committee.
This is my written submission opposing the government proposal to create a new appointed regulatory body that will essentially prohibit New Zealanders sharing their personal views, and opinions on line which do not conform to the narrow one sided opinions of Gov appointed gatekeepers under the guise of ‘protecting vulnerable minorities’.
The new authority will not be subject to the democratic process.
That is unacceptable and dangerous.
I reject the idea that the creation of such a regulatory authority will make New Zealanders safer.
I believe it will have the opposite effect because it will curtail the most essential attribute for a free and civil society… The right to free speech, which includes the right to hold and express views that are contrary to those of the government of the day.
Free speech is essential to the safety of the people, including minorities as their views, opinions, and general liberty are protected by the same principles of Law… equally applied.
History shows that Government regulation of free speech puts populations in grave danger!
This government has tried to enact hate speech laws in the recent past yet met with strong public outrage and yet here we are… the same meddlesome radicals hoping to enact their own designs through the back door while the people are unaware.
The majority of New Zealanders do not even know these proposals are being pushed forward!
This is an attempt to subvert democracy and enact this regulatory body by stealth!
Where was all the Public advertising that you were planning this curtailment of their free speech on line?
Where was your invitations to the public to have their say?
Zero!
This can be juxtaposed with all the Gov mass advertising telling the people to get vaccinated!
Obviously this government thinks free speech is not a matter of great Pubic importance!
In truth this government considers free speech an impediment to the implementation of their radical agenda.
So on the basis that this proposal will not face thorough public notification and consultation, I hold this committee to desist from moving forward with the proposals in the discussion document as they have no legitimate mandate from the New Zealand people.
I had to receive my short notice of your intended power grab from independent free speech watchdogs ‘The Free Speech Union’, and Hobson’s Pledge!
This exposes the underhand nature of what is afoot… You wanted to minimise public input because you know what you are proposing goes against the will of the majority.
For the same reason this Government has pushed through so many radical new laws under urgency when there has been no legitimate justification for doing so!
They have done this to sidestep the Legal safeguards that are supposed to prevent Radicals corrupting our Democracy.
This has been the least transparent, most undemocratic Government in the history of our nation.
They are running our country into the dirt!
This Radical Labour Government is in it’s death throes.
Jacinda Ardern quit her post knowing the writing was on the wall.
This Government cannot claim to represent us.
To enact this proposal will be an act of subversion against our democracy.
Let me now propose the correct way the rights of minorities and individuals are legitimately protected in a free and civil society.
Rather than by creating more Bureaucratic monstrosities and apartheid laws, the proper means to protect minorities is the entrenchment of a Bill of Equal Rights that Parliament and corporations must honor as the highest laws of the land.
It can be rightly argued that an absolute democracy ( Democratically elected parliament with absolute power) is nothing more than arbitrary mob rule and that as such minorities and individuals can and do get trampled under foot. This is what a Bill of Rights *with teeth* prevents.
The unspoken rationale for creating the proposed new on line Authority is to steer the public discourse, preventing popular dissenting voices from successfully rallying the people against Government desired social reforms and policies. The rationale is if Free speech is allowed to reign this will thwart unpopular Government interventions thereby perpetuating the imagined oppression of select minorities the woke socialists wish to ‘elevate’.
The means by which they now seek to achieve this (by censoring opinion) to control the public discourse is extremely partisan.
The establishment of Apartheid institutions such as this proposed Authority will corrupt the democratic process of which free speech and the right to dissent is fundamental.
Instead of fighting Racism These patently Racist laws and institutions entrench racism!
They ferment prejudices and disrupt racial harmony.
Noam Chompsky
The proper way to protect minorities from mob rule is by having an iron clad Bill of Rights which Parliaments must respect. This way minorities and individuals *are guaranteed the same rights* as everyone else. So that they cannot be legally oppressed as they have full redress to the Law and the principle of equality of rights!
Clearly the aims of the present Government is not true justice as defined by equality before the Law, but to grant special rights, privileges, and advantages to their pet demographics with one hand, while actively suppressing, disadvantaging, and trampling the rights of Demographics they disfavor.
This is how ‘Critical Theory’ and ‘Identity politics’ functions. It is diametrically opposed to equal rights, and justice, and the traditional enlightened ideals and values which made New Zealand a first world nation and makes our country such an exceptional place to live.
New Zealand is not a racist country!
New Zealand is not a bigoted Nation!
Any pretenses to the contrary are Radical Political constructs with no basis in fact or reality.
For example it is a travesty to sugest the greatest threat to New Zealand society is ‘White Nationalism… White supremacy’!
That is an outrageous slander against the good character of the New Zealand people!
It is a political lie!
On-line hate is not a serious problem in New Zealand that warrants this heavy handed intervention.
Critical Theory is in fact a recipe for creating Racist and bigoted societies fragmented by pitting one demographic against another.
It is easy to foresee the new regulatory Authority would seek to suppress opinions like mine from being desseminated on line.
I would be censored out of existence in the on-line public square.
I would most likely be maligned by this Regulator and defamed as a hateful and dangerous racist, and would have no way to defend my name.
Their Hate speech laws could even threaten me with jail.
The idea is that people like me should not participate in public discourse, but shut up… and allow the government to impose it’s will unchallenged.
These are serious matters.
The powers that be seeking to establish this new authority do not wish the conversation to be taken in this direction for obvious reasons.
They don’t like opinions like mine that express concerns their new engine will be used for nefarious political ends. They take umbrage at the very thought their personal views might be considered dangerous and hateful! How dare I!
As we speak they are attempting to de-legitimise and disqualify submissions like mine under the guise of being ‘hateful’ ‘offensive’, and thereby not be obliged to register them and make them publicly available for scrutiny.
Tell me whose interests are really served by this raft of curtailments of long established democratic rights?
They want to maintain the pretense that the proposed authority will make the internet ‘safer’ for certain groups and will lose little sleep that their Thought Police will suffocate dissenters like me.
In fact they salivate at having such power.
I’m a member of a particular minority they despise!
I’m the type of ‘dangerous’ thinker they wish to keep everyone ‘safe’ from!
In reality I am a defender of truth and freedom and an enlightened advocate for limited government and equality before the law.
Values and ideals held by a majority of New Zealanders… The group the Socialist radicals wish to subjugate.
I have no hate in my heart.
I am passionate about protecting Freedom and National independence for my children’s sake… and their children.
Why do you think most New Zealander strongly oppose the government setting up such an Authority which will curtail their On-line freedoms?
We know such an authority will be used to prevent criticism and protests against the governments radical socialist agenda which stands in opposition to New Zealanders long held traditional values and ideals… and that is why this governments agenda can accurately be described as radical and hostile.
The proposals are in fact seeking to impose Racial prejudices into law under the pretense of combating racism!
I am of Maori decent yet the proposals frighten me because they give powers to censor dissenting views which seek to rally the people of New Zealand to defend our national interests, and resist the Globalist socialist agendas being planned abroad by powerful organizations which is nothing short of surrendering our National sovereignty.
It is no exaggeration to say that should this new Authority be enacted that it will be done so without any mandate of the Majority of New Zealanders but against their well established and previously clearly expressed will… that of strong and overwhelming opposition to the furtherment of institutional Racial separatism. This is easily gleaned from the many other attempts New Zealand Governments have tried to further entrench separatism, yet were faced with overwhelming expressions of public objection.
Examples of this are plentiful, such as the 2013 Government Constitutional Review.
Now the Radicals, having had their aims thwarted by the safeguards of Democratic due process, now seek to achieve their apartheid goals by subverting public consultation processes, referendums, and other impediments that have been put in place to prevent our Government and Laws being highjacked by Radicals against the will of the people.
Regarding The concept of Te Ao Māori (Māori world view)
What a travesty!
The truth is there is no such thing as ‘The Maori position’. The Pro-Maori position, etc. *That is a politically manufactured travesty*,
Like all peoples (such as the Pakeha) despite decades of propaganda and indoctrination in the State education system, we Maori don’t all think the same things, believe the same ideas, etc.
The notion that People can be so easily compatmentalised is shambolic!
Thinking Maori individuals can and do exist on all sides of any debate… They are not all locked in ‘Group think’… slaves to their tribes, or their ethnicity. It is therefore a scam to pretend any hand picked body of Bureaucrats will be ‘representative’ of Maori.
In the same way that the majority of Maori do not support the regressive and divisive views of Te Pati Maori!
Yet we can be sure your new Regulatory board will be peopled with Radicals who peddle Te Pati Maori type wares cloaked under the guise of being ‘The Official Maori World View’.
Most Maori today are not stuck in the past but happily share modern Western Values and concepts with the rest of New Zealand. ‘He Iwi Tahi Tatau’ We have become one people in the true spirit of the Treaty of Waitangi. While we still enjoy many aspects of our cultural heritage we do not appreciate nor desire to be hog tied to the past, values, and backward concepts that may have held currency long ago.
So any idea of an Official ‘Maori view’ being today distinct from all other Kiwis is a false political construct designed to institutionalise Racial divide and prevent citizens from being able to voice their abhorrence for such a contemptible, and divisive scheme. To speak against this scheme will be deemed to be *Anti-Maori and Hateful Racism*.
This is a claim Te Pati Maori Radicals make all day every day!
That is the sort of politics this new authority will represent.
The idea of entrenching an ‘Official Maori world view’ is a scheme that seeks to reverse the progress of the last 150 years and Re insnare most Maori back under tribalism.
The very act of speaking out against these racist schemes will be deemed to be ‘Anti-Maori’ and rendered a thought crime!
How can a democracy work when Political Parties Like Te Pati Maori, The Greens, and Labour make all sorts of derogatory claims about Pakeha New Zealanders, and twist historic reality to suit their own agenda, accruing more and more Authority, Power, and Tax money unto themselves all the while the rest of New Zealand must sit in silence while they are being defamed, defrauded, and disenfranchised?
This is what happens under an apartheid State!
This is real racial prejudice!
This is what your proposal seeks to establish and why it is an abomination!
When will you wake up to the fact that all your decades of so-called socialist ‘positive discriminations’ designed to raise Maori out of their dire social statistics are a complete failure?
The true problems facing the Maori people today is not racial oppression, but poor ethics, backward ideas, and a massive lack of self responsibility!
All your socialism and victim blaming of the Pakeha has rendered them basket cases!
They take zero ownership of their own circumstances.
If they are ever to rise out of the mire they must quit all the blame and take ownership for their criminality.
They must take ownership for their own ill health.
Socialism traps people in Dependence upon the State!
It does not promote Moral fibre and strong self-reliance!
Maori are already the most politically favoured race in New Zealand by a country mile. Yet that truth never prevents them from claiming to be the perpetual victims of Racism.
Socialism is a totalitarian ideology that treats populations like hapless puppets rather than free Self governing individuals with rights… to be manipulated, and cajoled into conforming
to Socialist aims… all under the guise of Social justice as conceived by them… The self-professing benevolent Puppet masters.
They are forever attacking freedom and forever hungry for more power and authority.
They know best! That is what they believe and they expect us to surrender our own values and beliefs and bend to their superior will.
To question their motives and wisdom is to be considered a Hateful bigot and crackpot.
The thing is we New Zealanders are not so easily fooled! We know who really are the dangerous Crackpots and extremists whose values are at variance with the people and traditions of our country!
The race question is just one Free speech issue your proposed regulator threatens to suffocate.
Other socialist schemes will also become forbidden to dissent… such as on matters of Immigration, Vaccination, Climate Change policy, Matters of Sex Education, sexuality, etc. as it is easy to predict ‘scope creep’ from this new body and the very idea of ‘A Maori World View’ must be by it’s very nature.. an ‘All encompassing Wholistic paradigm’ with tentacles reaching into all things political.
We Freedom loving New Zealanders will not tolerate our Free nation being hijacked by Radicals hell bent on destroying the foundations of Freedom… esp Free Speech.
We shall peacefully resist at every step, as is our right.
“Free Speech is a lighted lamp to be held high so as to dispel the darkness of barbarous, backward, and unjust traditions and ideas that have yet to be vanquished, and it is for this reason that Freethinkers with new, progressive, and better ideas have always been in danger of being lynched by the mob who don’t take kindly to having their ingrained delusions exposed to the light.
We must always be vigilant, and fearful, and view with suspicion any political party or vested interest that seeks to pass laws that restrict free speech.
Guard it as you would your own family for, should this right be whittled away and lost, so too will other precious rights fall in quick succession and, if you fail to defend this essential right, you will bequeath to your children a life of virtual slavery and indoctrination.
Their future depends on their rights and liberties being secure and it is our duty to ensure they remain so on our watch until we exit the stage. Then it will be up to them to remain eternally vigilant for that is the price of Liberty.” (Free Speech Under Attack. Tross Publishing. pg 181-182)
There are members of our parliament whose true allegiances lie with a corporation of Foreign interests such as the World Economic Forum, The United Nations, The World Health Organisation… who desire to destroy the foundations, values, and traditions that underpin Western Nations, and which have caused them to prosper far above other portions of the world.
These Globalist organisations have a plan by which they seek to usurp the Sovereignty and Independence of prosperous Nations like New Zealand.
They desire to cripple our democratic foundations whereby the people elect their own leaders for the sake of putting their nation and peoples interests first.
This creates a bulwark that stands in the way of the Globalist scheme for a New World Order, Global digital currency and ID system.
That is why the Golbalists know nationalistic democracies like the one we have in NZ must be weakened, so that their Global schemes can be imposed… most of which is contrary to the best interests of these First world nations.
The people are not fools. We can see when politicians are betraying our interests. And when they do this we protest, and we sack them.
The Globalists plan requires politicians of divided loyalty to gain control over their nations internet and regulate what citizens may or may not say on line.
Then they can control dissent and prohibit online discussion and protests against the implementation of the Globalist agenda.
You may mock my opinions. That’s fine. Just remember I have the right to hold and express them on line and out on the street.
I have the right to participate in the Democratic processes of this country,
In conclusion I reiterate my absolute opposition to the establishment of this Un-elected regulator of New Zealanders On-line activities.
I believe Free Speech must be upheld for All New Zealanders and that no ‘official Narratives’ be allowed to be ‘blueprints’ for what New Zealanders are allowed to Think, or say.
It is not hateful to hold and express values and beliefs that dissent from the Government of the days opinions and theories’.. or even ‘Science’. It is a right that must remain protected By Law for that is vital for any Free society to exist.
Tim Wikiriwhi
Maori Christian Libertarian New Zealander.
He Iwi Tahi Tatau.
‘We are now one people’.
More from Tim.
BILL OF RIGHTS FOR INTERNET USERS: DONALD TRUMP, CHAMPION OF FREE SPEECH.
THE MATRIX : FACEBOOK, AND THE END OF FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY IN NEW ZEALAND.
JACINDA ARDERN IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN COVID-19: CENSORSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE PRESS.
LOST PLOT. WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY.
WORLD WAR 3 ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB. THE CRUSHING OF FREE SPEECH IN NEW ZEALAND.
With the approaching coronation of King Charles, the question of remaining in the Commonwealth inevitably bubbles to the surface. The screen shot above shows that Polls have been running in Canada to this very question.
It has always been the ambition of Cold War Communism to overthrow ‘British imperialism’ and set up their own quazi-‘Imperialism’ of Global Socialism, and they have set about achieving these objectives via ‘a long march’ infiltrating all tiers of Social institutions esp Education, and also by the strategy of ‘Divide and Conquer’… agitation for rebellion amongst ‘Indigenous populations’…. creating Social unrest, and Racial strife all designed to Weaken and Destroy British based democracies like New Zealand.
It has always been a Marxist wet dream to see the Commonwealth fragment.
This being so, whenever the question of New Zealand leaving the Commonwealth has come up, it has always been a thorny issue for me as a Libertarian.
I do believe it is the natural order of progression for a Nation to become fully independent… a Republic, yet the question must be asked… What sort of Republic would be established?
If the answer is to be an Apartheid Socialist Republic (which is what the Leftist radicals want) then as far as I’ve been concerned New Zealand fares much better to remain under the Civilised wing of Great Britain, and her Rule of Law, and The system of Equal Rights! And also maintaining our Commonwealth fraternity of shared enlightenment values.
This is what Queen Elizabeth represented. She was an anchor that slowed down the disintegration of values and as such there was great merit in remaining in her Commonwealth.
She lived long, and people were free under her rule, to the degree that she did not impose her personal beliefs via the Law as was normal in previous ages. She governed as an exemplar of Character and personal virtue.
The stone of Destiny has arrived in London for Charles Coronation.
She has gone now, and King Charles is about to be Coronated with Diadem, holding the Orb, and Scepter… mystical relics that imbues Sovereignty and Awe!
Or at least that is how it’s all supposed to work!
Charles has had plenty of time to contemplate his succession, and he more than anyone appreciates the challenge of being/ becoming a rightful ‘King’ in the hearts and minds of myriads of people… The majority of whom are Moderns… educated, democratic… steeped in enlightenment values, and who put little weight on the mystical powers of the Baubles of office.
The Divine right of Kings’ is an obsolete doctrine.
Many Britain’s simply see the Monarchy as a Tourist attraction.
Then you have the Noisy minority of Woke Marxist extremists in every corner of the Commonwealth who want to abolish the monarchy and set up a Communist New World Order!
These people are fundamentally opposed to everything British. They despise The values of the Commonwealth, They are a dangerous and destructive element… who in their right mind would listen to these lunatics?
At birth Princess Elisabeth was not directly in line for the Throne, yet she was fated to be Queen. She was by the time of her Coronation popular with the people, particularly for her conduct during WW2 when she and her parents shared the lot of Londoners during the Bliz. Upon turning 18 voluntered to aid the War effort becoming a Mechanic in the Auxiliary Territorial Service (ATS), the women’s branch of the British Army.
Read more here.
As already mentioned, with his mothers enduring reign, Charles has had plenty of time to seriously contemplate how he is going to perpetuate popular support for the Monarchy into the New era yet I think he has made a monumental blunder in thinking the future will be Woke.
He has positioned himself not only as a member of the Cult of Climate Alarmism, he has also endorsed Claus schwab’s ‘Great Reset’.
Is this because *His masters in the Illuminati* have commanded him to steer the British empire in this direction?
Prince Charles and Evelyn de Rothschild.
It is a dangerous path to take!
Not only is it a betrayal of the independence of the British Isles, In taking this course he is selling out the chief reason why it was a reasonable idea for Nations like New Zealand to remian in the Commonwealth!
If The King has gone Woke… then we are better of cutting ties and setting up our own Republic that retains our Sovereignty separate from Schwabs Globalist NWO.
This means we must defend Free Speech at all costs so that we can rally our people to fighting the Communist Globalists embedded in our institutions and establish a truely Free Constitutional republic.
I believe Charles has made a huge blunder.
Western civilisation hangs in the balance, yet I believe the true weight still is in favour of Commonsense, National sovereignty, and Christian/enlightenment values.
We all know what a monumental marketing blunder it was for Budweiser Beer to go woke! Totally alienating their Core Customer base. The strategy was to ‘modernize’ their brand to make it more appealing to the next generation…. It was an Epic failure!
Charles is the Bud-light of Kings, basing his future upon bad marketing advice. If the Monarchy no longer stands for the Classical British Ideals that underpinned the Free West then it no longer serves it’s purpose as a bulwark against barbarous encroachments.
Wrong Bet Charlie!
Go Woke… Go Broke!
He is primed to sell out the British Isles and Commonwealth to Claus Schwarbs Great Reset, and the WEF New World Order.
The Coronation itself will be a spectacle!
Not since Edmund Hillary conquered Everest has the Empire witnessed such Pomp!
So under King Charles will the monarchy become like Tits on a Bull?
Serving no useful purpose whatsoever?
Worse still will be be a bumbling fool and lead the Empire into Socialist Global slavery?
It sure looks that way.
Update: 7-5-23
The Big problem New Zealand has is that one of Comrade Jacinda Ardern’s most treasonous actions was to alienate New Zealand from the ANZUS alliance, preferring to snuggle up the the Chinese Dragon.
In fact the previous National Party Government…. Blinded by truck loads of Yuan had already moved us in this same direction… putting us more and more into economic dependence with this Demonic Power.
This is frightening stuff!
Despite my fears about Charles, with all the subversive voices echoing around the globe demanding apologies for colonization, and polls that claim nations don’t want Charles as their monarch, I do believe maintaining the Commonwealth is in New Zealand’s best interests as we are militarily weak, thus our only protection from being swallowed up by the likes of China is in having close mutual bonds with more powerful allies of which Great Britain and fellow Commonwealth countries like Australia are vital.
This is much to be preferred than becoming a Vassal of The Chinese Communist Party.
Long Live the King!
Tim Wikiriwhi
Christian Libertarian.
More from Tim… KING TIMOTHY’S FUTURE LOVE PARADISE!
TIM WIKIRIWHI’S SUBMISSION TO THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW. 2013